2016
DOI: 10.1080/15275922.2015.1133729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of morphological and chemical differences of gunshot residues in different ammunitions using SEM/EDS technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gunshot residue particles are of an irregular and spherical shape. Under the spheroidal category, particles may be displayed as a perfect sphere but they also might appear stretched, dented or even distorted [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gunshot residue particles are of an irregular and spherical shape. Under the spheroidal category, particles may be displayed as a perfect sphere but they also might appear stretched, dented or even distorted [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end, in conflicting evidence of the literature cited from many years, for reasons we do not understand some Authors [67,68,69] still describe the formation of GSR as a phenomenon that occurs with the solidification of the gases when they leave the inside of the weapon. By the way a notorious expert, operating in our country, often asserted in court that the typical GSR spherical morphology was due to the circular motion given to the particles by the barrel rifling.…”
Section: The Enthalpy Per Unit Volume H Can Be Expressed Likementioning
confidence: 96%
“…An explanation for the spatial distribution of GSR, depending on the weapon used, was also given by Chohra et al (19). The authors place an emphasis on the proximity of both the hand that operates the firearm to the ejection port, and the hand holding the gun barrel to the exhaust gas locations (35)(36)(37). The distribution of residue, especially upon the hand used to fire the gun and the hand holding the barrel of the gun, was shown to depend upon the weapon used and the corresponding areas of plume discharge.…”
Section: Spatial Distribution Of Gsrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high contamination of both hands is of particular note when the second hand is used for supporting the shooting stance (18). Kara et al (35) reported that since the hand holding the barrel of the gun is closer to the muzzle of the gun than the hand pulling the trigger, the non-shooting hand may be contaminated with a greater amount of GSR. It was found that the back of the shooter's supporting hand contained over 30% more GSR particles than the shooter's firing hand.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%