2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of parameter sensitivity for groundwater potential mapping in the mountainous region of Nepal Himalaya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This curve is a widely used metric for predicting model accuracy in classification issues [100]. In several studies, this method has been used to assess the accuracy of the groundwater potential mapping using a GIS-based AHP method [6,98,[101][102][103][104][105].…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This curve is a widely used metric for predicting model accuracy in classification issues [100]. In several studies, this method has been used to assess the accuracy of the groundwater potential mapping using a GIS-based AHP method [6,98,[101][102][103][104][105].…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the consistency ratio was computed as per equation 8 and the computed result was CR = 0.03 which was less than 0.1and the given weights were accepted for further analysis. Groundwater Recharge zone map (GWRZM) was computed after checking all criteria as follows: GWRZM= 44.16Rf + 25.97slo + 14.63LU + 8.11Dd + 4.160Ld +2.52Geo…………… (6) Rainfall, Slope, Land use land cover and drainage density hold the highest value relative to the other parameters. The weights assigned for Rainfall were greater than the weight of others, which influence the process of groundwater recharge than other parameters.…”
Section: Normalized Principal Eigen Vectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its extensive fieldwork, this technique is has a great application. Both the GIS and RS are now considered essential tools for assessing potential groundwater for further studies, particularly in extended and complicated systems [6] [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose those variables, which many researchers have extensively used. In the plain regions, topographic and climatic parameters have been recognized as important variables, while in the mountains, along with topographic, geological variables have been described as critical variables for GWP mapping (Mallick et al 2021c;Al-Djazouli et al 2021;Pathak et al 2021;Namous et al 2021;Al-Abadi et al 2021). For example, drainage density could be a valid variable in flood plains, not in mountainous regions (Bhattacharya et al 2021;Fadhillah et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%