2012
DOI: 10.5194/os-8-859-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Release-05 GRACE time-variable gravity coefficients over the ocean

Abstract: Abstract. The latest release of GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) gravity field coefficients (Release-05, or RL05) are evaluated for ocean applications. Data have been processed using the current methodology for Release-04 (RL04) coefficients, and have been compared to output from two different ocean models. Results indicate that RL05 data from the three Science Data Centers -the Center for Space Research (CSR), GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ), and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) -are more consistent … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
179
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values are from Release-05 data processed by the three main science data system centers at the University of Texas at Austin Center for Space Research (CSR;Bettadpur, 2012), the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL; Watkins and Yuan, 2012), and the GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ; Dahle, 2013). These data are then postprocessed by Don P. Chambers at the University of South Florida following the methods detailed in Chambers and Bonin (2012) and Johnson and Chambers (2013). We consider the ensemble mean across the estimates, deriving an estimate of the standard error according to variances in the differences between series (Ponte and Dorandeu, 2003).…”
Section: Gravimetric Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values are from Release-05 data processed by the three main science data system centers at the University of Texas at Austin Center for Space Research (CSR;Bettadpur, 2012), the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL; Watkins and Yuan, 2012), and the GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ; Dahle, 2013). These data are then postprocessed by Don P. Chambers at the University of South Florida following the methods detailed in Chambers and Bonin (2012) and Johnson and Chambers (2013). We consider the ensemble mean across the estimates, deriving an estimate of the standard error according to variances in the differences between series (Ponte and Dorandeu, 2003).…”
Section: Gravimetric Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We study the mean equivalent water height (MEWH) within selected river basins to assess the signal content and the RMS of the non-seasonal variability over the oceans to assess the noise levels of the monthly gravity fields. The C 20 coefficient is excluded from the analysis because it is degraded in most of the GRACE gravity fields (Chen et al 2005) and normally replaced by SLR-derived values (e.g., Chambers and Bonin 2012;King et al 2012 andVelicogna andWahr 2013). …”
Section: Comparison Of Individual Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different processing strategies were applied, resulting in various noise characteristics of the individual solutions. Numerous studies compare subsets of the available monthly gravity fields in various geophysical applications such as ocean bottom pressure, ice mass change, and glacial isostatic adjustment (e.g., Chambers and Bonin 2012;Johnson and Chambers 2013;Sasgen et al 2007a;Steffen et al 2009). Sasgen et al (2007a) and Sakumura et al (2014) compared and combined the three official SDS and the GRGS gravity fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three products (coded CSR, JPL and GFZ; release 05) each had a nominal 1 • and monthly resolution. The land and ocean mass retrievals (Chambers and Bonin, 2012) were combined. The land retrievals had been "de-striped" and smoothed with a 200 km half-width spherical Gaussian filter (Swenson et al, 2008;Swenson and Wahr, 2006), whereas the ocean retrievals had been smoothed with a 500 km filter (Chambers and Bonin, 2012).…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%