1975
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1975.03615995003900010034x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Soil Testing Methods for Predicting Growth and Response of Pinus elliottii to Phosphorus Fertilization

Abstract: Soil tests were evaluated as methods for predicting height growth or increased height growth due to P fertilization of Pinus elliottii var. elliottii Engelm. on acid Coastal Plain soils. Growth and response parameters were obtained from field and greenhouse trials fertilized at time of planting with N and P. Field trials were measured 1, 3, and 5 years after planting and the greenhouse trial, which involved unfertilized soils collected from the field trials, was measured 1 and 2 years after planting.The amount… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With few exceptions (Ballard and Pritchett, 1975;Burger and Kelting, 1999;Froehlich and McNabb, 1984;Gale and Grigal, 1988;Powers, 1980), correlations between soil monitoring variables and potential productivity tend to be anecdotal or regionally restricted in North America, and others used by the Forest Service are mainly conceptual. Because they are conceptual and somewhat subjective, they can be challenged as being too lenient or too stringent.…”
Section: Background For the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With few exceptions (Ballard and Pritchett, 1975;Burger and Kelting, 1999;Froehlich and McNabb, 1984;Gale and Grigal, 1988;Powers, 1980), correlations between soil monitoring variables and potential productivity tend to be anecdotal or regionally restricted in North America, and others used by the Forest Service are mainly conceptual. Because they are conceptual and somewhat subjective, they can be challenged as being too lenient or too stringent.…”
Section: Background For the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pfertilizer is needed at planting (Pritchett et al 1961), and thereafter a combination of N and P is far better than either nutrient alone (Amateis et al 2000). The concentration of P in an acid extract (Bray2-P) best discriminated between responsive and non-responsive sites at planting (Ballard and Pritchett 1975). Once established, leaf area index (LAI) is the main diagnostic.…”
Section: Indicators Of Plantation Response To Fertilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements of immediatelyavailable P fail with plants having high P requirements (Ballard and Prichett, 1975). Under these conditions, the soil's ability to buffer the concentration of P in solution becomes important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%