2013 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC Workshops) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/pimrcw.2013.6707852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of spectrum access options for indoor mobile network deployment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the values of different spectrum bands will be different [13]- [14]. Moreover, and possibly more importantly, the values will be different for different stakeholders [6].…”
Section: Analysis Of Spectrum Valuation Elements For Local 5g Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the values of different spectrum bands will be different [13]- [14]. Moreover, and possibly more importantly, the values will be different for different stakeholders [6].…”
Section: Analysis Of Spectrum Valuation Elements For Local 5g Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis also highlighted the stakeholder perspective as a key factor in understanding and assessing the value of spectrum. Authors in [6] have pointed out that the value of spectrum is not the same for all stakeholders, for example for MNOs and local operators. Authors in [5] present strategic value as a reflector of the expected position and competitive advantage of an operator from the assigned spectrum, which is completely defined from the operator stakeholder's view and is different for smaller and larger players.…”
Section: B Key Elements For Spectrum Valuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LTE evolution and future 5G networks are expected to change the mobile communication market structure and be increasingly locally deployed by new entrant stakeholders. Facility owners' role as a local operator serving MNOs' customers is highlighted by Zander in [34] and Ahmed, Markendahl and Ghanbari in [35] as a feasible solution for the deployment of building specific ultra-dense networks. Furthermore, local high-quality 5G wireless networks are gaining increasing attention as the solution to deliver guaranteed quality of service, particularly concerning the low latency requirements, in various use cases of vertical sectors and enterprises [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Private mobile communication networks as standalone solutions or collaboratively serving MNOs' customers are particularly envisaged to operate in shared spectrum bands [37]. Spectrum options for local indoor network deployments by local operators were assessed by Ahmed, Markendahl and Ghanbari [35] for different spectrum allocation options where the local operators were either collaborating closely with the MNOs or deploying their own independent networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, co-existence of small cells and macro cells in the same frequency bands introduces new types of interference [18], [19]. In contrast, dedicated allocation of licensed bands to small cells would lead to spectrum underutilisation and is not of interest to the operators [20]. Besides, the deployment of small cells is subject to additional costs in terms of, e.g., high-speed backhaul and additional infrastructure [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%