2020
DOI: 10.17582/journal.pjar/2020/33.1.89.96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Spring Wheat Genotypes for Climatic Adaptability using Canopy Temperature as Physiological Indicator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dodig et al (2012) and Sareen et al (2014) also inferred related ndings after screening wheat accessions and land races for drought tolerance potential. It is also reported that the tolerant genotypes managed to mitigate drought stress damage by maintaining better leaf water contents, leaf chlorophyll, number of grains per spike and grain weight than others (Slafer et al, 2014;Sohail et al 2019). The results implying that selection for these physio-agronomic traits could signi cantly improve the yields and these parameters should be used as important target traits while screening genotypes for drought tolerance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Dodig et al (2012) and Sareen et al (2014) also inferred related ndings after screening wheat accessions and land races for drought tolerance potential. It is also reported that the tolerant genotypes managed to mitigate drought stress damage by maintaining better leaf water contents, leaf chlorophyll, number of grains per spike and grain weight than others (Slafer et al, 2014;Sohail et al 2019). The results implying that selection for these physio-agronomic traits could signi cantly improve the yields and these parameters should be used as important target traits while screening genotypes for drought tolerance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The heatmap and ward's hierarchical clustering classi ed SBLs into three distinct clusters, i.e., cluster 1 with negative Z-score (dark blue colour) was comprised of 21 SBLs which showed less mean yield attributes and recognized as drought sensitive lines i.e. SBLs 25,23,19,28,34,39,41,46,47,08,31,43,07,42,14,45,48,33,49,18 tolerant group (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Cluster Analysis and Heat Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nine genotypes had mean values lower than standard check (Kingbird=3.22 t ha -1 ) for grain yield. Similarly, several authors reported wide range of variation in bread wheat for grain yield (Dargicho et al 2015b;Alemu et al 2019;Sohail et al 2019;Ashebir et al 2020).…”
Section: Spike Character Harvest Index Biomass Yield and Grain Yieldmentioning
confidence: 89%