2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2018.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the apparent diffusion coefficient in patients with recurrent glioblastoma under treatment with bevacizumab with radiographic pseudoresponse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to previous studies, the present clinical study showed relatively satisfactory results and met our expectations. However, the good response data based on the results of MRI may be an effect of pseudo-response similar to what is known with bevacizumab 28. In our clinical study, patients who failed treatment with apatinib had particularly rapid tumor recurrence and more diffused cerebral edema.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Compared to previous studies, the present clinical study showed relatively satisfactory results and met our expectations. However, the good response data based on the results of MRI may be an effect of pseudo-response similar to what is known with bevacizumab 28. In our clinical study, patients who failed treatment with apatinib had particularly rapid tumor recurrence and more diffused cerebral edema.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These diffusion changes suggest increased microstructural integrity, probably associated with vascular normalization resulting from BEV treatment. 21,29,61 More importantly, our study demonstrates that post-BEV DKI metrics may provide information about tumor progression. Higher post-BEV diffusivity (MD, D k , D k10% and D k90% ) and lower kurtosis (K k10% ) in NELs were correlated with poor PFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, the post-regorafenib variation in the mean ADC thus calculated did not signi cantly correlate with the corresponding change in FET-positive volume, nor with the RANO response categories. A possible explanation for this discrepancy may lie in the different methodological approaches used here and in the previously published studies [13,34,[43][44][45][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. This highlights the importance of future efforts towards standardizing the analysis of ADC maps before considering the inclusion of this methodology in the response assessment criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A standard spherical volume (radius = 5 mm) was then placed on the ADC images in the hemisphere contralateral to the tumor, carefully avoiding lateral ventricles and major vessels, in order to derive the mean ADC value of the normal brain parenchyma (BG ADC ). This method was chosen in view of the stability of the ADC values in the "healthy" brain parenchyma during treatment with antiangiogenetic agents [13]. A qualitative assessment of the high resolution DWI and ADC derived maps was performed in every patient and revealed no signi cant distortions or misregistrations affecting the selected tumor area or background area.…”
Section: Page 4/11mentioning
confidence: 99%