2000
DOI: 10.1202/0002-8894(2000)061<0064:eotcov>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of Various Passive Monitors and Active Monitors for Industrial Hygiene Sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also has to be cheap, to make it possible to do large studies where sampling simultaneously in many different locations or over a geographical area is wanted. 78 An important feature for a PAS as a personal monitor is that they should be convenient for the subject to wear. The device should be small and light, and it is important that it does not affect the worker (subject) during his/her work.…”
Section: Active/passive Sampler Comparisons and Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has to be cheap, to make it possible to do large studies where sampling simultaneously in many different locations or over a geographical area is wanted. 78 An important feature for a PAS as a personal monitor is that they should be convenient for the subject to wear. The device should be small and light, and it is important that it does not affect the worker (subject) during his/her work.…”
Section: Active/passive Sampler Comparisons and Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas-chromatographic separation and the GC-programmes are described by Liljelind et al 12,13 For all compounds reference standards were prepared by injecting the analyte dissolved in methanol onto conditioned adsorbent tubes under a flow of helium. A mixture of (¡)-a-pinene, (1S)-(-)-b-pinene and (1)-D 3 -carene (ratio 10 : 1 : 5) dissolved in methanol was used to prepare reference standards for quantification of terpenes. Chromosorb 106 has previously been found to be the most suitable adsorbent for sampling and subsequent thermal desorption determination of benzene.…”
Section: Experimental Air Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In a recent study Nothstein et al compared the costs-effectiveness, as a function of the number of annual samplers, for five passive samplers and one active sampler (charcoal tube with a pump). 3 Including validation costs, sampling equipment costs and labour costs, the calculations indicated that in general the unit cost was lower for a passive sampler than for an active sampler. If the passive sampler is thermally desorbed and thereby can be reused, as with the Perkin Elmer tube, the price per analysis is even lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of obtaining samples with the expertise of industrial hygienists can therefore be high considering the time required and the operational costs. A cost-effective and simpler alternative to active sampling is passive sampling, [4] which is also less disturbing for the worker. Passive sampling does not rely on a pump and requires no power supply; it uses gravity and diffusion to collect particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%