2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of benchmark multi-walled carbon nanotubes in relation to their physicochemical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the expected exposure route, all the in vitro studies used lung cells such as A549 and BEAS-2B cells. In a study using both cell lines and two different MWCNT (NM401 and NM402) positive MN induction was detected in A549 cells when exposed to the selected MWCNTs; however, negative effects were observed in the BEAS-2B cells [62]. Our results show a positive MN induction when using the FCMN assay, although without a clear dose-response relationship.…”
Section: Fcmn Assay Cbmn Assaymentioning
confidence: 45%
“…According to the expected exposure route, all the in vitro studies used lung cells such as A549 and BEAS-2B cells. In a study using both cell lines and two different MWCNT (NM401 and NM402) positive MN induction was detected in A549 cells when exposed to the selected MWCNTs; however, negative effects were observed in the BEAS-2B cells [62]. Our results show a positive MN induction when using the FCMN assay, although without a clear dose-response relationship.…”
Section: Fcmn Assay Cbmn Assaymentioning
confidence: 45%
“…In fact, a more recent study showed that SWCNT and MWCNT caused a low level of DNA damage on mesothelial cells as assessed by the comet assay, in some cases only at relatively high doses (48-hr exposure to 80 mg/cm 2 ), and little or no effect was observed on bronchial epithelial cells. This discrepancy was explained by the different size-distribution of MWCNT in the cell culture medium, rather than by the cell line specificities (Louro et al, 2016). These observations suggest that mesothelial cells are more sensitive to the CNT-associated DNA damaging effects than bronchial epithelial cells.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, discrepant results were observed in the two cell lines: cytotoxic effects were detected only in A549 cells with the IC 50 values varying from approximately 8 to 61 mg/cm 2 and the two longest MWCNT significantly raised the micronucleus frequency in A549 cells at the highest tested concentrations (64 and 128 mg/ cm 2 ), whereas in BEAS-2B cells negative results were obtained for all MWCNT. This discrepancy was explained by the different size-distribution of MWCNT in the cell culture medium, rather than by the cell line specificities (Louro et al, 2016). In another study, the rigid MWCNT-7 (2.5 and 15 mg/ml) was able to induce micronuclei formation in human lymphocytes exposed ex vivo, supporting the chromosome damaging effect of some MWCNT with the potential to mediate a tumorigenic effect in humans (Tavares et al, 2014).…”
Section: Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS‐2B) was kindly provided by Dr. Baoxin Bai of Shanghai East Hospital, China. They are the two mostly used lung cell models in literature (Louro et al, ; Strauch, Niemand, Winkelbeiner, & Hartwig, ) and similar in many aspects, but they have differences in phenotype and proliferation. A549 is a cancer cell belongs to type II lung epithelial cells and can differentiate to other lung cells, while BEAS‐2B is a non‐cancer cell.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When conducting toxicological assessments on lungs, many cell types could be used, though they have differences in phenotypes, morphologies, proliferation rates, mRNA and protein expressions, antioxidant capacities, pro‐inflammatory states, and cell cycle distributions (Lujan, Criscitiello, Hering, & Sayes, ). Here, both human alveolar epithelial cell line A549 and human bronchial epithelial cell line BEAS‐2B were used, for they are the two mostly used lung cell models in literature (Louro et al, ; Strauch, Niemand, Winkelbeiner, & Hartwig, ). A549 cells maintain many morphological and biochemical characteristics of pneumocytes type II (Lieber, Smith, Szakal, Nelson‐Rees, & Todaro, ) and BEAS‐2B cells are targets of inhalation and play an important role in the maintenance of mucosal integrity as mechanical barriers against various particulate (Takizawa, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%