Evaluation of the Impact of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms on Computed Tomography Texture Features of the Liver Parenchyma Using the Filtration-Histogram Method

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) reconstruction algorithms affect the CT texture features of the liver parenchyma.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study comprised 58 patients (normal liver, n = 34; chronic liver disease [CLD], n = 24) who underwent liver CT scans using a single CT scanner. All CT images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) (iDOSE4), and model-based IR (IMR). On arterial phase (AP) and portal venous phase (PVP) CT imaging, quantitative texture analysis of the liver parenchyma using a single-slice region of interest was performed at the level of the hepatic hilum using a filtration-histogram statistic-based method with different filter values. Texture features were compared among the three reconstruction methods and between normal livers and those from CLD patients. Additionally, we evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the CT texture analysis by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).ResultsIR techniques affect various CT texture features of the liver parenchyma. In particular, model-based IR frequently showed significant differences compared to FBP or hybrid IR on both AP and PVP CT imaging. Significant variation in entropy was observed between the three reconstruction algorithms on PVP imaging (p < 0.05). Comparison between normal livers and those from CLD patients revealed that AP images depend more strongly on the reconstruction method used than PVP images. For both inter- and intra-observer reliability, ICCs were acceptable (> 0.75) for CT imaging without filtration.ConclusionCT texture features of the liver parenchyma evaluated using the filtration-histogram method were significantly affected by the CT reconstruction algorithm used.

Performance of Prediction Models for Diagnosing Severe Aortic Stenosis Based on Aortic Valve Calcium on Cardiac Computed Tomography: Incorporation of Radiomics and Machine Learning

“…Further study is required to validate our results externally and generalize the utility of the radiomics analysis of AVC. Second, the reproducibility of radiomics features was not fully considered, specifically regarding the effects of the CT scanner, image acquisition, and reconstruction parameters on the extracted radiomics features and prediction models ( 34 35 ). Application of deep learning algorithm may help solve the problem of reproducibility in radiomics by reducing variability in scan protocol, for example, conversion of reconstruction kernel or slice thickness ( 36 37 38 ).…”

Influence of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions on CT Radiomic Features in Oncologic Patients

“…Sung et al [8] investigated the influence of three different reconstruction methods (FBP, hybrid IR (iDOSE) and model-based IR (IMR)) on CT first-order texture features of liver parenchyma in both normal and in chronic liver disease on scans acquired with contrast medium. CTTA was performed with the same software applied for our study.…”

“…Despite texture analysis being a promising tool for quantitative assessment of images, due to the novelty of the technique applied in medical imaging, CTTA still needs to be standardized and validated. An important aspect is the CTTA reproducibility related to the influence of CT acquisition parameters (e.g., level of radiation dose, slice thickness, reconstruction algorithms) that can affect results and standardization among different Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1000 2 of 10 studies [8][9][10]. This aspect is gaining interest, as shown by Erdal et al [11] who demonstrated that slice thickness influenced reproducibility of radiomic features in lung nodules, and Prezzi et al [12] who showed the influence of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm versus traditional filtered back projection (FBP) on radiomics quantification in twenty-eight datasets of colorectal cancer.…”

Optimization of imaging parameters in chest CT for COVID-19 patients: an experimental phantom study

“…In the present study, when iDose4 level 7 was used, the proportion of the obtained images meeting the diagnostic requirements greatly increased. Iterative model reconstruction (IMR) might be able to broaden the experiment results further, although there are different results and opinions (18,19). At the same time, although the thin slices showed details in high resolution, the significant increase in noise harmed the appearance of the ground-glass nodule boundary.…”