2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the implementation of best available techniques in IPPC context: an environmental performance indicators approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After more than ten years of implementation, despite difficulties, recent literature proposes an assessment of the efficacy of the IPPC directive implementation in some industrial activities in terms of environmental performance, such as the steel and glass industry (Rave and Triebswetter, 2008), the Finnish pulp and paper industry (Silvo et al, 2009) and pharmaceutical manufacturing installations (Styles et al, 2009b). Moreover, measurement of the environmental performances of IPPC industry and evolution of implementation of techniques in the IPPC context seems to rise (Styles et al, 2009b;Karavanas et al, 2009). Nevertheless, it also gives an incentive for the development of a progressive and systematic evaluation approach as well as a continuous improvement approach in environmental performances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After more than ten years of implementation, despite difficulties, recent literature proposes an assessment of the efficacy of the IPPC directive implementation in some industrial activities in terms of environmental performance, such as the steel and glass industry (Rave and Triebswetter, 2008), the Finnish pulp and paper industry (Silvo et al, 2009) and pharmaceutical manufacturing installations (Styles et al, 2009b). Moreover, measurement of the environmental performances of IPPC industry and evolution of implementation of techniques in the IPPC context seems to rise (Styles et al, 2009b;Karavanas et al, 2009). Nevertheless, it also gives an incentive for the development of a progressive and systematic evaluation approach as well as a continuous improvement approach in environmental performances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a more concentrated attention to specific situations, and in order to help stakeholders to update their exploitation licenses, in Cikankowitz and Laforest (2013), a methodology is proposed on the evaluation of existing BAT techniques, in order to provide a general framework for the assessment of production units and management processes. Karavanas et al (2009) in their study present an integrated methodological approach for the evaluation of the implementation of the Best Available Techniques (BAT) in facilities operated under Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive, based on the development and application of a set of sub-indices. An aggregated form of sub-indices that could be used as a composite IPPC facility index is proposed.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, Dewulf and Van Langenhove (2005) create slightly more disaggregated "environmental sustainability indicators," to be used in comparing alternative technologies within a given sector. Also, Karavanas et al (2009) create facility level indicators that permit comparison with sector peers in either disaggregated or single-indicator performance measures, and comparison of sectors in the latter. They create "sub-indicators" within each of a number of performance "components" (energy use, emissions, etc.)…”
Section: Mepi (2001)mentioning
confidence: 99%