Evaluation of the knowledge, experience and gender influence on the shade matching

Erzincanlı, Ayşe; Kazazoğlu, Ender

doi:10.5505/yeditepe.2018.99608

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…28 In the current research, the result showed that gender had no statistically significant effect on shade matching. This result is similar to the study findings of Alfouzan et al, 21 Erzincanlı and Kazazo glu, 23 and Aswini et al 27 In addition, the result of the present research corresponds with the study of Negahdari et al 4 who compared shade matching using two shade guide systems of Vitapan Classical and 3D Master by dental students. The cited study reported that there was no significant difference between the two genders, but males exhibited higher results when the Vitapan Classical shade guide was used and females exhibited better results by using the 3D Master system.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…The percentage of the visual‐instrumental shade agreement scores was significantly higher for clinically experienced dentists. Furthermore, Erzincanlı and Kazazoğlu, 23 evaluated the effect of color knowledge, gender, and experience on the quality of shade matching. The results showed that examiners with basic color knowledge matched the shades more successfully.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…10 To identify problems in color vision Ishihara color blindness test could be summarized as the "gold standard" for the quick identification of inherited red-green defects. 19 The shade matching proficiency of a clinician is significantly enhanced by their clinical experience, knowledge, and training in the shadematching protocol, several studies supported that, [20][21][22][23] while some studies showed that experience is not an important feature in shade matching. [24][25][26][27] The impact of gender on shade matching capabilities is still an argumentative topic among scholars.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparison between direct and indirect “digital image” dental visual shade matching considering the effect of clinical experience and gender

Makhloota,

Köroğlu,

Turhan Bal

et al. 2024

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionShade matching is an essential procedure to obtain an esthetic prosthesis. The Direct Visual Shade Matching (DSM) method using shade guides is the most used method by dentists. However, The Indirect Visual Digital Shade Matching (ISM) method based on digital imaging is concerned to be reliable and useful in determining shade matching in dental practice. Several factors such as method, clinical experience, and gender can affect the success of shade matching.Aim of the StudyThis study aimed to compare these two methods and evaluate the effect of experience and gender on the results.Materials and MethodsThree volunteers' maxillary central incisor teeth were evaluated using (DSM) and (ISM) methods by 87 examiners (42 males, 45 females). These examiners were further divided into three groups based on their clinical experience: Undergraduate Preclinical Dental Students (UPDS) with 31 examiners, Undergraduate Clinical Dental Students (UCDS) with 34 examiners, and Postgraduate Dental Students from the Department of Prosthodontics (PDS) with 22 examiners. The spectrophotometer device results of three teeth were considered as a reference for shade matching. Statistical analyses of the data were performed using Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, and Chi‐square tests.ResultsNo significant difference was found between indirect and direct methods according to Perfect Matches (p > 0.05). However, according to Shade Matching Deviation Score (SMDS) values a statistically significant difference was found between the two methods where the best result was obtained with the ISM method (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the PDS group and the other two groups in terms of clinical experience (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between gender groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionDigital images, captured under standardized lighting conditions, may serve as a reliable alternative method for direct shade matching. The (ISM) method requires a camera, related accessories, and computer skills. However, as these tools are commonly available nowadays, the focus for practitioners should be on effectively learning and applying these tools to achieve the best results. While clinical experience plays a significant role in the shade matching process, gender does not appear to have a substantial influence.Clinical SignificanceThis study found no significant differences between the (DSM) and (ISM) methods, leaving the clinical relevance of this method open to debate. However, the ISM method yielded superior responses. Despite requiring specialized tools, conditions, and training, the widespread use of cameras and computers in modern clinics makes the necessary equipment and software readily available. This method enhances clinician‐technician communication, potentially improving prosthesis esthetics and patient satisfaction, especially for less experienced clinicians or those with color deficiencies. Further research is crucial to determine its clinical significance.

show abstract