1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.1999.842810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of transmission source collimation for SPECT attenuation compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substituting (13) into (12), we obtained a separable surrogate function (14) Minimizing and enforcing the nonnegativity constraint, we obtained the update as (15) where the operator for , and zero otherwise. From (5), we have the gradient (16) To calculate the gradient as in (16), one should perform one forward-blur in and one back-blur in . Taking into account only for rays within the same projection view, these blurring steps are performed frame-by-frame within projection/backprojection and do not affect severely reconstruction time.…”
Section: In Transmission Imaging the Measurement Model Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Substituting (13) into (12), we obtained a separable surrogate function (14) Minimizing and enforcing the nonnegativity constraint, we obtained the update as (15) where the operator for , and zero otherwise. From (5), we have the gradient (16) To calculate the gradient as in (16), one should perform one forward-blur in and one back-blur in . Taking into account only for rays within the same projection view, these blurring steps are performed frame-by-frame within projection/backprojection and do not affect severely reconstruction time.…”
Section: In Transmission Imaging the Measurement Model Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To adapt our method to the OSTR algorithm, we replaced the sum over in (16) with the sum over subsets of the rays, and approximated with , which is independent of the iteration number thus achieving a fast implementation [24]. From (13), we have (17) Since the blur caused by the finite detector resolution is small, we approximated , where if , otherwise…”
Section: In Transmission Imaging the Measurement Model Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations