Evaluation of Visual Outcomes in Patients Implanted with Acri.LISA 356D Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Yuvacı, Sümeyra; Ünlü, Cihan; Bayramlar, Hüseyin; Erdoğan, Gürkan; Güney, Esra; Vural, Ece Turan

doi:10.4274/tjo.41.09719

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, problems such as glare and halo due to multifocal IOLs implanted in the patients with preexisting corneal astigmatism have been frequently encountered in the studies. [7][8][9] Several methods, including changing the site of incision in phacoemulsification, astigmatic keratotomy or limbal relaxation incisions, have been tried during surgery to reduce astigmatism. However, these procedures have restrictions such as long-term mechanical instability and the limited degree of astigmatism that can be corrected.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[4][5][6] However, it was reported that depth of focus reduces and problems such as blurred vision, photophobia, halo and glare are more prevalent in the patients that underwent multifocal IOL implantation and have uncorrected corneal astigmatism of 0.75 diopter and over. [7][8][9] In addition to correction of refractive defect and enabling near vision without the need for eyeglasses, also correction of astigmatism has been possible with multifocal toric IOL that has been manufactured recently. Accordingly, dependency on eyeglasses following surgery has become less prevalent.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison between clinical outcomes of two different designs of toric multifocal intraocular lenses

Ayar¹,

Özmen²,

Yazgan³

et al. 2017

Med-Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To compare the clinical outcomes of plate haptic and open-loop haptic toric multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). In this retrospective, comparative clinical trial, two different designs of multifocal toric IOL were implanted in 49 eyes of 38 cases with corneal astigmatism ≥ 0.75 Diopter (D). The cases that underwent AcrySof IQ restore multifocal toric IOL (Alcon, open-loop-haptic) implantation were assigned to Group1 (n=19) and the cases that underwent Acriva Reviol multifocal toric IOL (VSY, plate-haptic) implantation were assigned to Group 2 (n=30). After surgery, the groups were compared in terms of degree of IOL rotation, residual spherical refraction and astigmatism and uncorrected near and distance visual acuity. With regard to the results of postoperative 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month and 1st year, no difference was determined in terms of uncorrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE), degree of astigmatism (CYL), degree of rotation, and uncorrected near visual acuity (p>0.05). Significant increase was determined in all postoperative follow-up periods in terms of the distance and near visual acuity as compared to preoperative values (p<0.05). There was no correlation between degree of rotation and age, axial length, SE and CYL (p>0.05). Clinical outcomes of plate haptic Acriva Reviol multifocal toric IOL and open-loop haptic Acrysof IQ multifocal toric IOL are similar. Both types of IOL effectively reduce astigmatism and provide satisfactory uncorrected distance and near visual acuities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%