2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluations on gridded precipitation products spanning more than half a century over the Tibetan Plateau and its surroundings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results also suggested that the CHIRPS dataset tended to overestimate precipitation compared to the rain-gauge stations in the QTP. Our findings are consistent with the results of previous studies by Liu, et al [9], Wu, et al [10], and Tan, et al [11] for CHIRPS and APHRODITE in the QTP. It was reported that APHRODITE and CHIRPS in the QTP with POD values of 0.90 and 0.38, FAR values of 0.34 and 0.58, and CSI values of 0.63 and 0.28, respectively [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Results also suggested that the CHIRPS dataset tended to overestimate precipitation compared to the rain-gauge stations in the QTP. Our findings are consistent with the results of previous studies by Liu, et al [9], Wu, et al [10], and Tan, et al [11] for CHIRPS and APHRODITE in the QTP. It was reported that APHRODITE and CHIRPS in the QTP with POD values of 0.90 and 0.38, FAR values of 0.34 and 0.58, and CSI values of 0.63 and 0.28, respectively [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our findings are consistent with the results of previous studies by Liu, et al [9], Wu, et al [10], and Tan, et al [11] for CHIRPS and APHRODITE in the QTP. It was reported that APHRODITE and CHIRPS in the QTP with POD values of 0.90 and 0.38, FAR values of 0.34 and 0.58, and CSI values of 0.63 and 0.28, respectively [11]. In this study, POD values were 0.95 and 0.34, FAR values were 0.38 and 0.50, and CSI values were 0.60 and 0.25 for APHRODITE and CHIRPS, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is seen that areas of high rain gauge density give more reliable precipitation estimates than those of low-density areas [3,4]. However, due to economic constraints and infeasible natural conditions, such as in the Arctic [5] and in the Tibetan Plateau, ground-based observations are usually sparse, especially in several developing countries, where ground-based rainfall observation networks have always been relatively sparse [6][7][8]. Hence, precipitation data retrieved from satellite sensors act as a A similar approach using calibration scenarios for developing hydrological signatures in ungauged catchments could be carried out to formulate a hypothesis regarding the effects of sensitive parameters of each dataset to understand the catchment characteristics worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%