2007
DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.45.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines in OHS: Are They Agree-Able?

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptance, validity, reliability and feasibility of the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines and REsearch and Evaluation) instrument to assess the quality of evidence-based practice guidelines for occupational physicians. In total, 6 practice guidelines of the Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB) were appraised by 20 occupational health professionals and experts in guideline development or implementation. Although appraisers often disagreed on individual … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note is the high level of agreement and concordance among the three appraisers in comparison with the results obtained by other authors 29) . Such a favorable result may be due to the fact that, unlike other studies 13,29) , the appraisers here were instructed on the procedure to follow, and moreover, the process ended Cannot be calculated for scores of appraiser 2 because all were in category 0 (strongly disagree and disagree). with a face-to-face meeting where they could clarify any doubts that came up during appraisal, which has been shown to improve overall, final agreement 12) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note is the high level of agreement and concordance among the three appraisers in comparison with the results obtained by other authors 29) . Such a favorable result may be due to the fact that, unlike other studies 13,29) , the appraisers here were instructed on the procedure to follow, and moreover, the process ended Cannot be calculated for scores of appraiser 2 because all were in category 0 (strongly disagree and disagree). with a face-to-face meeting where they could clarify any doubts that came up during appraisal, which has been shown to improve overall, final agreement 12) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, the AGREE tool appears to have become more widely accepted as the standard for appraisal of guideline development quality with satisfactory levels of reliability for most of the domains it appraises 33,34) , and it has been endorsed by the WHO and many national guideline bodies. A variety of adjustments to the tool have been reported 33) including modifying its structure, scoring process or addition or omission of domain items, and it has already been used to evaluate the quality of six occupational health guidelines 29) . What appears to be valuable in the use of AGREE is the illumination of aspects related to guideline quality and opportunity to enhance rigor and consistency in future production 32) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of projects was dealing with search strategies and is published already [12][13][14][15] . One project evaluated AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation) as a quality assessment system for practice guidelines 16) . Projects evaluating the effectiveness of an EBM course supplemented by peer group case discussions are still ongoing.…”
Section: The Dutch Knowledge Infra Structure (Kis) Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concrete health care activities such as a diagnostic medical examination might be wanted by a worker, or a workers' council might like to discuss with experts the need for a screening programme. Then OH professionals are needed with practical experience and Industrial Health 2007, 45, [13][14][15][16][17][18] able to transfer and interpret scientific knowledge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…their lives, effective communication with patients should be maintained, their last wishes and demands should be met, their pain should be controlled and managed, their anxiety and stress should be reduced, as well as aggressive and painful procedures should not be performed or it should be done in the shortest time (46).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%