1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1044-0305(96)89165-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for a mechanism that involves secondary electron capture in the liquid secondary ionization mass spectrometry beam-induced dehalogenation of organic compounds

Abstract: The effect of the analyte electron affinity on the liquid secondary ionization mass spectrometry beam-induced dehalogenation of simple bromoaromatic compounds in a glycerol matrix was investigated. The results show a definite trend of decreasing dehalogenation with increasing analyte electron affinity. At high analyte electron affinity (≥ 1.0 eV), no dehalogenation was observed. These results are consistent with electrochemical and pulse radiolysis studies where one electron reduction was shown to be responsib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matrix effect (ME) is often observed in LC-MS=MS analysis for complicated sample including urine samples, which could enhance or suppress the signal response of target analytes (Theberge and Bertrand 1996;Jones et al 2007). SPE with mixed phase mode sorbent was often used to extract and clean the b 2 -agonists in a complicated sample matrix to decrease the sample matrix effect (Ramos et al 2000;Haasnoot et al 1998;Nielen et al 2008) due to its association of apolar and ionic mechanisms (Chen et al 1992).…”
Section: Cleaning Efficiency Of Mipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix effect (ME) is often observed in LC-MS=MS analysis for complicated sample including urine samples, which could enhance or suppress the signal response of target analytes (Theberge and Bertrand 1996;Jones et al 2007). SPE with mixed phase mode sorbent was often used to extract and clean the b 2 -agonists in a complicated sample matrix to decrease the sample matrix effect (Ramos et al 2000;Haasnoot et al 1998;Nielen et al 2008) due to its association of apolar and ionic mechanisms (Chen et al 1992).…”
Section: Cleaning Efficiency Of Mipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional reports of dehalogenation with CI have also appeared . Dehalogenation has also been observed with 252 Cf plasma desorption, thermospray, fast‐atom bombardment (FAB), and liquid secondary ionization mass spectrometry (FAB‐LSIMS) …”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[13] Dehalogenation has also been observed with 252 Cf plasma desorption, [14] thermospray, [15] fast-atom bombardment (FAB), [16,17] and liquid secondary ionization mass spectrometry (FAB-LSIMS). [18][19][20] For determination of ICM in environmental samples, liquid chromatography (LC)/MS has been the preferred method for sensitive determination of these compounds. Electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS, usually operated in the positive-ion mode, has been the method of choice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%