“…Based on textural and chemical evidence, amphibole in some Archean anorthosite‐bearing layered intrusions has been interpreted to be of magmatic origin and be indicative of hydrous magmatism (Hoffmann et al, 2012; Mohan et al, 2013; Piaia et al, 2017; Polat et al, 2011; Rollinson et al, 2010; Santosh & Li, 2018; Sotiriou, Polat, Frei, Yang, & et al, 2019; Sotiriou et al, 2020). The textural evidence for magmatic amphibole includes serrated igneous boundaries with calcic plagioclase, whole‐grain optical continuity and extinction, its occurrence as interstitial oikocrysts, and its anhedral form (Hoffmann et al, 2012; Mohan et al, 2013; Piaia et al, 2017; Polat et al, 2011; Rollinson et al, 2010; Santosh & Li, 2018; Sotiriou, Polat, Frei, Yang, et al, 2019; Sotiriou et al, 2020). This textural evidence distinguishes magmatic amphibole from metamorphic amphibole, which does not have serrated grain boundaries, does not occur as interstitial oikocrysts, and is euhedral (Sotiriou et al, 2020).…”