“…For example, for five studies, the authors were unable to access their data (Peters et al, 1992;Knost et al, 1997;Nappi et al, 2002;Katsarava et al, 2003;Sandrini et al, 2006), two considered that it was inappropriate to use their data and declined to share their results (Carleton et al, 2006;Biurrun Manresa et al, 2013a,b), and the authors of nine studies did not respond to several enquiries about their data (Leroux et al, 1995;de Tommaso et al, 2000;Desmeules et al, 2003Desmeules et al, , 2014Banic et al, 2004;Lang et al, 2005;Ayzenberg et al, 2006;Al-Azzawi et al, 2008;Mendak et al, 2010). As noted in the peer review process of the current review, this does reflect a kind of bias -towards papers the authors of which are willing and able to share their data for the purposes of the meta-analysis.…”