1993
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/262.2.499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for structure in the H I column density distribution of QSO absorbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

22
207
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
22
207
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in good agreement with the Petitjean et al (1993) data over the whole column density range down to log N H i ∼ 13.5, following a power law at log N H i = [12. 75,14].…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are in good agreement with the Petitjean et al (1993) data over the whole column density range down to log N H i ∼ 13.5, following a power law at log N H i = [12. 75,14].…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We compare our results with the observations by Petitjean et al (1993) and Hu et al (1995). Our results are in good agreement with the Petitjean et al (1993) data over the whole column density range down to log N H i ∼ 13.5, following a power law at log N H i = [12.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyses of high-redshift data (Petitjean et al 1993;Press & Rybicki 1993;Hu et al 1995;Dobrzycki & Bechtold 1996;Kim et al 2001) showed that the value of is in the 1.4-1.7 range. Analysis of low-redshift data from HST/GHRS (Penton et al 2000) indicated near the high end of this range, at 1.7-1.8.…”
Section: Line Equivalent Width and Neutral Hydrogen Column Density DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the technique adopted by T02 and S04 was similar, i.e. a statistical correction for the unidentified absorbers by considering an empirical parametrisation (see Petitjean et al 1993;Davé & Tripp 2001), the overall correction applied was very different as pointed out by S04. In fact, S04 noted that the correction considered by T02 was less than 1% over the whole rest-frame wavelength range, which underestimated the number of Ly α absorbers by a factor of ∼ 50 at z = 0.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%