2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence for two distinct thalamocortical circuits in retrosplenial cortex

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would also be informative to learn whether many or only some neural projections from the ATN support this example of non-spatial paired-associate learning. Neuroanatomical evidence suggests a different pattern of neural connections with limbic and cortical memory structures among the three ATN nuclei, that is, the anterodorsal nuclei, anteroventral nuclei and the anteromedial nuclei (Bubb et al, 2017;Lomi et al, 2021;Nelson, 2021). In addition, these ATN component nuclei have different molecular and electrophysiological characteristics that may underpin different behavioural functions (Jankowski et al, 2013;Roy et al, 2021Roy et al, , 2022Safari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would also be informative to learn whether many or only some neural projections from the ATN support this example of non-spatial paired-associate learning. Neuroanatomical evidence suggests a different pattern of neural connections with limbic and cortical memory structures among the three ATN nuclei, that is, the anterodorsal nuclei, anteroventral nuclei and the anteromedial nuclei (Bubb et al, 2017;Lomi et al, 2021;Nelson, 2021). In addition, these ATN component nuclei have different molecular and electrophysiological characteristics that may underpin different behavioural functions (Jankowski et al, 2013;Roy et al, 2021Roy et al, , 2022Safari et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former explanation (direct spread) appears unlikely given the wide spacing of the retrosplenial injections in this and the previous study (Horikawa et al, 1988). To test for the second explanation (direct cingulum body uptake) we examined both the injection sites and the topography of retrogradely labelled cells within the anterior thalamic nuclei to see if they matched previous descriptions for that part of the retrosplenial cortex (Bubb et al, 2020;Lomi et al, 2021;Perry et al, 2021;Shibata, 1993;Sripanidkulchai & Wyss, 1986) or whether the labelled cells were distributed broadly across the nuclei, that is, more consistent with cingulum uptake. By these measures we did not find evidence of direct cingulum bundle uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This method will give higher double-cell counts if there is a bias towards zones of label overlap. In contrast, the present study counted cells across each entire nucleus, a method likely to reduce the proportions of double-labelled cells given the topographic origins of many of the cortical projections from within the target nuclei (Lomi et al, 2021;Shibata, 1993;Sripanidkulchai & Wyss, 1986). Even though the counting methods in the present study tended to be conservative (as indicated by parallel confocal analyses), when cell counts are made across the entire nucleus (Condé et al, 1990;Horikawa et al, 1988;Varela et al, 2014) the proportions of double-labelled cells were more comparable to those in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this is possible, it could also be the case that distinct AV subpopulations and their circuits have differential functional roles. This functional heterogeneity may map onto the well-known subdivisions within AV thalamus, specifically the anteroventral dorsomedial (AVDM) and anteroventral ventrolateral (AVVL) parts ( 29 , 30 ), or the anterior–posterior axis as has been shown for other thalamic nuclei ( 31 ). Additional work is needed to reveal potential functional heterogeneity (i.e., the presence of thalamic subnetworks) within AV thalamus ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%