Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ed000051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence Supports TB Test, So what Now?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results should be confirmed in another study but they are encouraging, taking into consideration the short time to positivity of the RETAp, compared with LJ medium culture (median, 10 days versus 25 days). 32). Culture methods in general cannot compare with this molecular test in terms of the time to obtain results and the simplicity of use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results should be confirmed in another study but they are encouraging, taking into consideration the short time to positivity of the RETAp, compared with LJ medium culture (median, 10 days versus 25 days). 32). Culture methods in general cannot compare with this molecular test in terms of the time to obtain results and the simplicity of use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, unprecedented efforts have been made by National Tuberculosis Programs (NTPs) across the globe to scale up these tests and included them as part of the routine TB diagnostic algorithms [9][10][11]. These NAATs have proven to have high accuracy, and research has increasingly focused on studying their actual clinical impact [10,[12][13][14][15][16]. While there are systematic reviews on the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert and LPAs [6,17,18], and others that separately describe diagnostic and treatment delays experienced by TB patients [19], no study has summarized the impact of NAATs on reducing time delays in diagnosis and treatment of TB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%