2009
DOI: 10.1080/01650420903148519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Baetiscidae (Ephemeroptera): current state of knowledge of the family

Abstract: Recent discovery and description of fossil Baetiscidae has dramatically changed the biogeographical and evolutionary perspective of the family. Since the mideighteenth century until recently, the family has been known only from the Nearctic realm and all extant species of the family still remain geographically limited to this region. Here, we present the first parsimony algorithm generated cladistic analysis of the phylogeny of Baetisca based on external morphological characters of both larvae and adults. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Edmunds and Traver (1954) also supported this classification under the new rank Prosopistomatoidea. While some authors had proposed different phylogenies for the two families (Landa andSoldán 1985, McCafferty 1991), a sistergroup relationship of Baetiscidae and Prosopistomatidae has by now been accepted by most other authors (Kluge 1995, McCafferty 1997, 2001, Kluge 2004, Staniczek 2007, Pescador et al 2009 and was finally also corroborated by genomic data (Ogden et al 2009). Other names coined for this monophyletic group were Baetiscoidea (Peters and Hubbard 1989), Posteritorna (Kluge 1995), andCarapacea (Mc-Cafferty 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Later, Edmunds and Traver (1954) also supported this classification under the new rank Prosopistomatoidea. While some authors had proposed different phylogenies for the two families (Landa andSoldán 1985, McCafferty 1991), a sistergroup relationship of Baetiscidae and Prosopistomatidae has by now been accepted by most other authors (Kluge 1995, McCafferty 1997, 2001, Kluge 2004, Staniczek 2007, Pescador et al 2009 and was finally also corroborated by genomic data (Ogden et al 2009). Other names coined for this monophyletic group were Baetiscoidea (Peters and Hubbard 1989), Posteritorna (Kluge 1995), andCarapacea (Mc-Cafferty 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In order to perform an integrated phylogenetic analysis of fossil and extant Baetiscidae, the character matrix using morphological data of extant Baetiscidae used by Pescador et al (2009) was modified and 14 additional characters were introduced (see Table S2 and Table S3). The combined data analysis included both nymphal and adult characters, with 36 characters in total.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations