Genital Cutting: Protecting Children From Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6407-1_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Circumcision Methods: Not “Just a Snip”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sejauh ini penelitian terdahulu dalam 1 dekade terakhir terkait Sunathrone Circumcision Device masih sebatas pada dunia kesehatan yang membahas akan efektivitas dan efiensi penggunaannya. Di antaranya penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Morris dan Elley 12 , Young 13 , dan Alawalmlh et al 14 . Namun, pengkajian akan pengaitan antara penggunaan Sunathrone Circumcision Device dengan tinjauan hukum Islam tampak belum pernah dilakukan.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Sejauh ini penelitian terdahulu dalam 1 dekade terakhir terkait Sunathrone Circumcision Device masih sebatas pada dunia kesehatan yang membahas akan efektivitas dan efiensi penggunaannya. Di antaranya penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Morris dan Elley 12 , Young 13 , dan Alawalmlh et al 14 . Namun, pengkajian akan pengaitan antara penggunaan Sunathrone Circumcision Device dengan tinjauan hukum Islam tampak belum pernah dilakukan.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Available methods and devices include freehand technique, dorsal slit method, use of the bone-cutter, and other glans guards which include plastibell device, Gomco clamp, Mogen clamp, Tara clamp, Smart clamp, Zhenxi Rings among others. [15] This has led to continuous improvement on the old devices while new ones are developing. [13,16] The Plastibell device was first described in 1956 in the USA by Kariher and Smith and has since become very popular, widely preferred by parents, and practiced due to its ease of application, safety, less blood loss, and shorter duration of the operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The survey confirms the conclusion of Hugh Young, in a study of circumcision techniques, that no fully satisfactory and entirely safe method has ever been devised and -given the complex and variable anatomy of the foreskin -none is ever likely to be. 9 Unlike a finger, an arm, the gall bladder or the appendix, the foreskin is not a discrete or self-contained member or organ that can easily be detached from the rest of the body. Since it is an extension of the penile skin system, there is no agreed point at which the "foreskin" ends and the rest of the penis skin begins, and thus no clearly-defined point at which the operator should start (or stop) cutting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%