2010
DOI: 10.1186/1743-422x-7-329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of Dengue Virus Type 3 Genotype III in Venezuela: Diversification, Rates and Population Dynamics

Abstract: BackgroundDengue virus (DENV) is a member of the genus Flavivirus of the family Flaviviridae. DENV are comprised of four distinct serotypes (DENV-1 through DENV-4) and each serotype can be divided in different genotypes. Currently, there is a dramatic emergence of DENV-3 genotype III in Latin America. Nevertheless, we still have an incomplete understanding of the evolutionary forces underlying the evolution of this genotype in this region of the world. In order to gain insight into the degree of genetic variab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phylogenetic analysis presented here confirms that DENV-3 outbreaks occurring in the American continent since the mid-1990s are the result of a single introduction of genotype III. This analysis also suggest that viral introduction probably occurs through Central America or Mexico, and from there the virus spread to the Caribbean and South America following three major routes, giving rise to three independent evolutionary lineages (Caribbean/South America I to III), consistent with previous findings [18], [19], [22]. According to this model, Central American countries and Mexico were the hubs of genotype III spread in the Americas, while the Caribbean region acted as a staging post between Central America/Mexico and South America.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The phylogenetic analysis presented here confirms that DENV-3 outbreaks occurring in the American continent since the mid-1990s are the result of a single introduction of genotype III. This analysis also suggest that viral introduction probably occurs through Central America or Mexico, and from there the virus spread to the Caribbean and South America following three major routes, giving rise to three independent evolutionary lineages (Caribbean/South America I to III), consistent with previous findings [18], [19], [22]. According to this model, Central American countries and Mexico were the hubs of genotype III spread in the Americas, while the Caribbean region acted as a staging post between Central America/Mexico and South America.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, the rates estimated for ZIKV in this study are roughly similar to the ones estimated for other members of the family Flaviviridae , like Dengue virus (DENV) (E, 0.76 × 10 −3 s/s/y), DENV type 3 genotype III (E, 0.84 × 10 −3 s/s/y), West Nile virus (WNV) (0.50 × 10 −3 s/s/y) …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The mean rate obtained for the ZIKV strains enrolled in these studies is comparatively similar to rates reported for fast evolving RNA viruses, like Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) (PR + RT region; 2.4 × 10 −3 s/s/y) 31 or Ebola virus (full genome, 0.96 × 10 −3 s/s/y). 32 Moreover, the rates estimated for ZIKV in this study are roughly similar to the ones estimated for other members of the family Flaviviridae, like Dengue virus (DENV) (E, 0.76 × 10 −3 s/s/y), 33 DENV type 3 genotype III (E, 0.84 × 10 −3 s/s/y), 34 West Nile virus (WNV) (0.50 × 10 −3 s/s/y). 35 Importantly, contributions of the third codon position to main evolutionary rate (2.394 from a total of 3.0) was found to be significant (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This may be explained by the slightly higher NS5 and E diversity in KFDV relative to the rest of the genome (Table 3), however, the limited number of KFDV isolates available for this study might not be fully representative of the extant KFDV diversity. In accordance with the evolutionary rate patterns for vector-borne flaviviruses [21], the AHFV/KFDV rate is slower than mosquito-borne flaviviruses, including Dengue virus (DENV) [22] and yellow fever virus (YFV) [23] and more similar to tick-borne flaviviruses, including the closely related tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV Siberian subtype, 1.64×10 −4 sub/site/year) [24]. The evolutionary rate is also similar to that of an unrelated tick-borne member of the Bunyaviridae family, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (0.58–1.52×10 −4 sub/site/year)[25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%