2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0639-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary divergence of HLA class I genotype impacts efficacy of cancer immunotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
243
2
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
13
243
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, sequence divergence of HLA was reported to be associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy 55 . In the present work, we demonstrated association between methylation of eDMRs targeting HLA and anti-PD-1 efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, sequence divergence of HLA was reported to be associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy 55 . In the present work, we demonstrated association between methylation of eDMRs targeting HLA and anti-PD-1 efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater the number of neoantigens, the greater the extent of "non-Annals of Oncology EditorialUnderstanding other biological variables that affect immune activation, including host factors such as major histocompatibility presentation, will likely further strengthen the predictive value of TMB in the future[5]. Greater HLA diversity enables better control of both infectious disease and cancer following immune checkpoint therapy by expanding the size of the immunopeptidome[15]. Greater HLA diversity enables presentation of more neopeptides, and hence works in conjunction with TMB to enable immune checkpoint efficacy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remarkable clinical response demonstrated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to a growing interest in understanding the interactions between cancer and immune cells 33,35,[55][56][57] . Although immunoediting is widely recognized as an evolutionary process that selects for clones with low immunogenicity or clones with an escape mechanism, its dynamics in the context of carcinogenesis and response to treatment are poorly understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results engendered the concept of cancer immunoediting where tumor cells are subject to three phases: elimination, equilibrium, and escape 29 . Cancer immunoediting is an evolutionary process that shapes tumour immunogenicity by selecting for clones depleted of neoantigens (immune-adapted) or with an immune evasion phenotype (immune-escaped) [33][34][35] . Neoantigens are generated, among other mechanisms, by single nucleotide variants (SNVs) leading to aminoacidic changes in a peptide previously recognized as a self-antigen 36 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%