2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolutionary rates of commonly used nuclear and organelle markers of Arabidopsis relatives (Brassicaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The synonymous substitution rate between Col-0 and C24 is 4.20 × 10 − 3 per site. The synonymous substitution rate between A. lyrata and A. thaliana (Col-0) is 1.04 × 10 − 1 per site, similar to previous results (Koch et al 2000; Huang et al 2012). Using a divergence time of 5 Ma for A. thaliana and A. lyrata (Koch et al 2000) results in a rate of 2.08 × 10 − 8 substitutions per site per year, similar to that previously obtained for nuclear genes in the Brassicales (Franzke et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The synonymous substitution rate between Col-0 and C24 is 4.20 × 10 − 3 per site. The synonymous substitution rate between A. lyrata and A. thaliana (Col-0) is 1.04 × 10 − 1 per site, similar to previous results (Koch et al 2000; Huang et al 2012). Using a divergence time of 5 Ma for A. thaliana and A. lyrata (Koch et al 2000) results in a rate of 2.08 × 10 − 8 substitutions per site per year, similar to that previously obtained for nuclear genes in the Brassicales (Franzke et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Recently, Huang et al . () published ITS evolutionary rates between Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. (Brassicaceae) and its outcrossing congeneric species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those of Huang et al . () ranged from 1.56 × 10 −9 to 3.44 × 10 −9 with a mean of 2.5 × 10 −9 sub/site/yr, and thus are c . 1.5 times lower than evolutionary rates given by Kay et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations