Ewing sarcoma of the rib—initial symptoms and clinical features: Tumor missed at the first visit in 21 of 26 patients

Abstract

Background and purpose Doctor's delay in diagnosing Ewing sarcoma is often long. We examined the initial symptoms of Ewing sarcoma of the rib to find characteristics that could help to shorten the delay in diagnosis and hopefully influence the prognosis.Patients and methods We examined the records from the first visit for symptoms related to Ewing sarcoma of the rib in 26 consecutive patients, all of whom were < 30 years of age and had been diagnosed between 1981 and 2000. All patients had a minimum of 5 years follow-up.Results A tumor was suspected at the first visit in only 5 of the 26 patients; pleurisy was the most common misdiagnosis. 23 patients complained of pain, localized or pleuritic, and 11 had a palpable mass. 15 of the 26 patients had chest radiographs taken at the first visit, but a tumor was suspected in only 4 cases. The most common radiographic finding was pleural effusiondiagnosed in 10 of the 15 patients. 23 patients were operated. It is noteworthy that in 6 patients no tumor was suspected before surgery. 12 patients died from the Ewing sarcoma. Median survival was 2.4 years. Doctor's delay was median 3.0 (0-10) months, but it exceeded 7 months in 4 patients. Patient's delay was 2.5 (0-10) months.Interpretation The most important clinical finding in Ewing sarcoma of the rib was a palpable mass and pleural effusion. Both findings are rare in this age group and should be thoroughly investigated.

Short and long-term results of sternectomy for sternal tumours

“…The importance of a radical surgery has been demonstrated by several authors (5,13,15,16): by intraoperative examination of soft tissue margin and the limit of 2 cm on the bone, in our series, we obtained a radical resection in all cases of PST; however, in case of SST we considered as acceptable a marginal resection, but always excluding an intralesional resection. As a result, all the operations were margin free, minimizing the incidence of local recurrence (8% in our series).…”

“…In the large populationbased study of Scandinavian Sarcoma Group, is clearly demonstrated the influence of wide free margins on survival; patients radically treated have higher probability of survival at 10 years (92%) compared with intralesional resections (13). Also others authors previously showed a better outcome in term of OS for patients surgically treated without margin involvement (1,19,22).…”

“…It is unclear whether surgical procedure and type of reconstruction could minimize the possibility of development of pulmonary complications; however, our results demonstrated that an effective rigid reconstruction, an early extubation and mobilization with an aggressive physiotherapy may decrease the incidence of respiratory impairment and related conditions. The importance of a centralized treatment in order to receive a multidisciplinary approach in chest wall tumours is widely accepted (13,15); in our series every treatment has been discussed and planned in an institutional sarcoma group, composed by orthopaedic oncologist, plastic surgeon, medical oncologist and radiotherapist. As result of this co-operation, 17% and 43% of patients in this series underwent induction and adjuvant therapy, respectively.…”

Multidisciplinary Approach and Clinical Algorithm in Resection and Reconstruction for Chest Wall Tumor

“…[2,7] Rate of local recurrence of chondrosarcoma has been reported as highly dependent on surgical margin, ranging from 4% to 73%. [8] In treatment of soft tissue sarcoma on lower and upper extremities, compartment resection approach has been the accepted mode of treatment, but no such approach has existed for chest wall sarcoma. Primary tumor easily infiltrates ribs and skeletal tissue, necessitating resection of chest wall.…”

Chest Wall Chondrosarcoma

“…In contrast, the 10-year survival rate was 47% and the local recurrence rate 73% in patients treated with an intralesional approach. Prognostic factors for local recurrence included both surgical margins and histologic grade (17).…”