2020
DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Examining associative conditioning with a positive peer context as a strategy to increase children's vegetable acceptance

Abstract: Summary Background Children's vegetable acceptance increases following repeated exposure and associative conditioning pairing a target vegetable with a well‐liked food. Yet traditional pairings may increase energy intake when well‐liked foods are calorie‐rich. Objectives To examine whether pairing a non‐food stimulus with target vegetables increases children's vegetable acceptance and whether effects exceed those of repeated exposure. Methods Twenty‐three 6‐to‐8‐year‐old children participated in twice‐weekly s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight studies used questionnaires [ 19 , 26 , 28 , 30 32 , 34 , 41 ], three used observations [ 23 , 30 , 36 ], and two of them used 24-h dietary recalls [ 21 , 24 ]. The main determinants of healthy eating measured were food preferences, liking, knowledge, self-efficacy, motivation, environment, exposure, availability, cooking skills, cooking behavior, involvement in family meals, and attitudes [ 17 , 20 22 , 26 – 29 , 31 – 35 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Eight studies used questionnaires [ 19 , 26 , 28 , 30 32 , 34 , 41 ], three used observations [ 23 , 30 , 36 ], and two of them used 24-h dietary recalls [ 21 , 24 ]. The main determinants of healthy eating measured were food preferences, liking, knowledge, self-efficacy, motivation, environment, exposure, availability, cooking skills, cooking behavior, involvement in family meals, and attitudes [ 17 , 20 22 , 26 – 29 , 31 – 35 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beets et al [ 22 ], Condrasky et al [ 26 ], Harmon et al [ 28 ], Mabary-Olsen et al [ 31 ], Murad et al [ 33 ], and Seal & Seal [ 34 ] measured increases in perceived control (i.e., self-efficacy or self-perception of competence towards cooking or healthy eating) while Beets et al [ 22 ], Gachupin et al [ 17 ], and Harmon et al [ 28 ] measured favorable changes in attitudes towards healthy foods. Finally, Ehrenberg et al [ 27 ], Heim et al [ 29 ], Mabary-Olsen et al [ 31 ], Tauriello et al [ 35 ], and Maxwell et al [ 32 ] measured increases in preferences towards fruits or vegetables, and Werner et al [ 41 ] measured increases in label reading.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, families may not offer a previously rejected food when food waste is a concern (Goodell et al, 2017). This is another context that warrants a toolbox approach, with a variety of evidence‐based strategies available for encouraging food acceptance (e.g., innovative approaches to repeated exposure or associative conditioning in community settings serving children from families with low incomes; Ehrenberg et al, 2019; Tauriello et al, 2020). Prioritizing community settings that serve populations at disproportionate risk of diet‐related disease is one way to enhance the applicability of research on food preference learning.…”
Section: Ecological Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%