Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores.

Abstract

This study examined the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) using secondary data drawn from 20 samples (N = 11,685)-7 English and 13 non-English-including 10 community, 6 student, 1 mixed community/student, 1 meditator, and 2 clinical samples. Self-compassion is theorized to represent a system with 6 constituent components: self-kindness, common humanity, mindfulness and reduced self-judgment, isolation and overidentification. There has been controversy as to whether a total score on the SCS or if separate scores representing compassionate versus uncompassionate self-responding should be used. The current study examined the factor structure of the SCS using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) to examine 5 distinct models: 1-factor, 2-factor correlated, 6-factor correlated, single-bifactor (1 general self-compassion factor and 6 group factors), and 2-bifactor models (2 correlated general factors each with 3 group factors representing compassionate or uncompassionate self-responding). Results indicated that a 1- and 2-factor solution to the SCS had inadequate fit in every sample examined using both CFA and ESEM, whereas fit was excellent using ESEM for the 6-factor correlated, single-bifactor and correlated 2-bifactor models. However, factor loadings for the correlated 2-bifactor models indicated that 2 separate factors were not well specified. A general factor explained 95% of the reliable item variance in the single-bifactor model. Results support use of the SCS to examine 6 subscale scores (representing the constituent components of self-compassion) or a total score (representing overall self-compassion), but not separate scores representing compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding. (PsycINFO Database Record

Could worry and rumination mediate relationships between self‐compassion and psychological distress in breast cancer survivors?

“…Each subscale has been shown to mediate the effect of a self-compassion intervention on reduced depression in BCa patients (Boyle, Stanton, Ganz, Crespi, Bower, et al, 2018). In a large cross-national study, Neff et al (2019) showed that Self-Compassion Scale items form distinct factors that correspond to Neff's (2003b) original subscales. We used subscale rather than full-scale scores as predictors.…”

The development of the Japanese version of the compassionate engagement and action scales

“…While these factors are of interest and are linked to mental health difficulties and well-being, the division into positive and negative factors and the use of the scale as a single score is controversial. [9][10][11][12]. Many researchers suggest the use of two factors not one [13].…”

The Process of Science: A Critical Evaluation of more than 15 Years of Research on Self-Compassion with the Self-Compassion Scale

“…This increased our skeptical scientific attitude regarding the SCS: we did not understand why researchers did not see the obvious point that we were making regarding this measure, and hence, we began to share our critical thoughts with the scientific community (Muris 2016;Muris and Petrocchi 2017;Muris et al 2016bMuris et al , 2019b. However, the developer of the SCS (Neff 2016a(Neff , b, 2019 maintained that the scale in its original form provides a good index of self-compassion.…”