Excess mortality for men and women above age 70 according to level of care during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden: A population-based study

Abstract

Background Both age and comorbidity are established risk factors for death among those infected with COVID-19. Because they often co-exist, it is difficult to assess if age is a risk factor on its own. Methods We used administrative register data of the total Swedish population from 01/2015 until 07/2020. We stratified the population aged 70+ into three groups according to level of care (in care homes, with home care, and in independent living). Within these groups, we explored the level of excess mortality in 2020 by estimating expected mortality with Poisson regression and compared it to observed levels. We investigated if excess mortality has been of the same magnitude in the three groups, and if age constitutes a risk factor for death during the pandemic regardless of level of care. Findings Individuals living in care homes experienced the highest excess mortality (75- >100% in April, 25–50% in May, 0–25% in June, depending on age). Individuals with home care showed the second highest magnitude (30–60% in April, 15–40% in May, 0–25% in June), while individuals in independent living experienced excess primarily at the highest ages (5–50% in April, 5–50% in May, 0–25% in June). Although mortality rates increased, the age-pattern of mortality during the pandemic resembled the age-pattern observed in previous years. Interpretation We found stepwise elevated excess mortality by level of care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden, suggesting that level of frailty or comorbidities plays a more important role than age for COVID-19 associated deaths. Part of our findings are likely attributable to differences in exposure to the virus between individuals receiving formal care and those living independently, and not only different case fatality between the groups. Although age is a strong predictor for mortality, the relative effect of age on mortality was no different during the pandemic than before. We believe this is an important contribution to the discussion of the pandemic, its consequences, and which groups need the most protection. Funding This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (FORTE: grant 2016-07115).

High excess deaths in Sweden during the first wave of COVID-19: Policy deficiencies or ‘dry tinder’?

“…Why there was so much more purported dry tinder in Sweden requires explanation. The risk discrepancy seems more likely to result from differences between Sweden and Denmark in how care and housing for the elderly are organised, coupled with a less successful Swedish strategy of shielding the elderly [ 13 ]. This interacts with the dry tinder hypothesis: if Sweden had a lot of dry tinder, perhaps Sweden should have made special efforts to protect those >85 years of age.…”

Rehabilitation needs and mortality associated with the Covid-19 pandemic: a population-based study of all hospitalised and home-healthcare individuals in a Swedish healthcare region

“…Regional home healthcare is administered in 136 institutions (care homes, with approximate capacity of 4,500 places) or, in a limited number of cases, in a patient’s home (approximately 2,500 individuals, with a proportion of them needing home care). In Sweden, the concept of home healthcare denotes consistent care of people unable to sustain independent living, 24 predominantly comprising elderly, frail and/or individuals with dementia, as well as those with severe and chronic multi-morbidity with similar limitations. As a rule, these individuals are treated in a home healthcare setting rather than being hospitalised.…”

The COVID-19 Crisis Management as the Management of a Project. Lessons Learned in Spain

“…Nevertheless, these metrics have not followed the same criteria in all countries. Modig et al (2021) argued that current available information makes it difficult to assess with certainty its exact value.…”