1983
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(83)90239-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange effects in photon scattering off the deuteron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point we disagree with the results of Ref. [37], in which it was found that the effect of the ∆-excitation onto the resonance amplitude at 100 MeV is negligible at small angles and very large at Θ γ ≥ 90 • giving a +15% increase in dσ/dΩ.…”
Section: B Two-body Seagull Amplitude: Low-energy Behaviorcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At this point we disagree with the results of Ref. [37], in which it was found that the effect of the ∆-excitation onto the resonance amplitude at 100 MeV is negligible at small angles and very large at Θ γ ≥ 90 • giving a +15% increase in dσ/dΩ.…”
Section: B Two-body Seagull Amplitude: Low-energy Behaviorcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…After then a number of calculations has been performed in 50's and 60's, mostly based on the impulse approximation [36]. A higher level of art, with an explicit consideration of MEC and of their influence on the so-called resonance and seagull amplitudes of Compton scattering was introduced by Weyrauch and Arenhövel [37]. They directly calculated the seagull contribution from the pion exchange and developed an approximate scheme based on dispersion relations in the long wave-length limit to find the resonance amplitude of Compton scattering from a theoretically known deuteron photodisintegration amplitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also interesting to compare our results with those from potential model calculations [32,33]. In Fig.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In Fig. 7, we show the fist non-vanishong order (NLO) results of F 2 and G 2 multiplied by a constant to compare with the form factors P 2(E1, E1) and P 2(M1, M1) calculated and plotted in [32]. The agreement on G 2 is ∼ 10% while the agreement on F 2 is ∼ 30-40%.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation