2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13040984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expansionary Evolution Characteristics of Plastic Zone in Rock and Coal Mass Ahead of Excavation Face and the Mechanism of Coal and Gas Outburst

Abstract: Factors leading to coal and gas outbursts are complicated, and the accuracy of predicting outbursts remains difficult to achieve. Therefore, coal and gas outburst risk are still a scientific challenge in the fields of mining, geology, safe engineering, and rock mechanics. Theories explaining and predicting coal and gas outbursts associated with restored strain and gas energy are hot topics. Based on numerical modelling, the evolution of a plastic zone ahead of an excavation face with change of direction and ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of tectonic, geostatic, and mining stresses on coal and gas outbursts (CGO) becomes more obvious with increasing mining depth [15][16][17][18]. Liu et al [19] established a mechanical analysis model of the expansion and evolution of the plastic zone in front of the driving face by numerical simulation method, analyzed the characteristics of the expansion and evolution of the plastic zone in front of the driving face, and discussed the physical and mechanical process and basic conditions of the development of coal and gas explosion caused by the evolution of the plastic zone. Zhang and Lowndes [20] used fault tree coupling analysis (FTA) and an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict the potential risk of a coal and gas outburst during underground mining of thick and deep coal seams in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of tectonic, geostatic, and mining stresses on coal and gas outbursts (CGO) becomes more obvious with increasing mining depth [15][16][17][18]. Liu et al [19] established a mechanical analysis model of the expansion and evolution of the plastic zone in front of the driving face by numerical simulation method, analyzed the characteristics of the expansion and evolution of the plastic zone in front of the driving face, and discussed the physical and mechanical process and basic conditions of the development of coal and gas explosion caused by the evolution of the plastic zone. Zhang and Lowndes [20] used fault tree coupling analysis (FTA) and an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict the potential risk of a coal and gas outburst during underground mining of thick and deep coal seams in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lunch of outburst indicates that some coal containing gas have experienced local damage, extensive failure, overall instability and throwing stage. Therefore, there are four periods for any particle failure of coal body in the outburst lunching area: initial failure period of ground stress, Stage of crack propagation by gas, outburst period of coal body instability, period of transportation and stop 49 .…”
Section: Experimental Phenomena and Failure Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reflects the speed of gas release by coal resolution. Generally, when the standard gas content is the same, the higher the initial gas release velocity, the more serious the coal destruction, and the greater the coal and gas outburst risk [42]. Pressure factors mainly refer to high ground stress and coal seam gas pressure in deep coal mining.…”
Section: Gas Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the mine and gas outburst risk levels are represented by 1, 2, 3, and 4, where 1 represents a low gas outburst risk (0-5.52 m 3 /t); 2 is a medium gas outburst risk (5.52-12.07 m 3 /t); 3 is a high gas burst risk (12.07-16.92 m 3 /t); and 4 is an extremely high gas burst risk (above 16.92 m 3 /t) [42]. A total of 124 sets were collected; the details are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: The Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%