2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.04.429791
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expectation-Based Gist Facilitation: Rapid Scene Understanding and the Role of Top-Down Information

Abstract: Scene meaning is processed rapidly, with 'gist' extracted even when presentation duration spans a few dozen milliseconds. This has led some to suggest a primacy of bottom-up information. However, gist research has typically relied on showing successions of unrelated scene images, contrary to our everyday experience in which the world unfolds around us in a predictable manner. Thus, we investigated whether top-down information - in the form of observers' predictions of an upcoming scene - facilitates gist proce… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
(297 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, participants were told that the images would be one of a few categories (e.g., animal vs. non-animal; Fabre- Thorpe et al, 2001). High accuracy in rapid scene processing (e.g., Evans & Treisman, 2005;Fabre-Thorpe et al, 2001) may depend on expectation (McLean et al, 2021;Sun et al, 2017). In our paradigm participants could not expect the images, yet they still reported impressive details of the briefly presented images.…”
Section: Elimination Of Expectationmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies, participants were told that the images would be one of a few categories (e.g., animal vs. non-animal; Fabre- Thorpe et al, 2001). High accuracy in rapid scene processing (e.g., Evans & Treisman, 2005;Fabre-Thorpe et al, 2001) may depend on expectation (McLean et al, 2021;Sun et al, 2017). In our paradigm participants could not expect the images, yet they still reported impressive details of the briefly presented images.…”
Section: Elimination Of Expectationmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For example, asking participants to choose between "animal" and "non-animal" will tell them they might see an animal. This could help participants perceive more detailed information (McLean et al, 2021;Sun et al, 2017), while it can suppress seeing other aspects of rapidly presented scenes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, participants were told that the images would be one of a few categories (e.g., animal vs. non-animal; Fabre-Thorpe et al , 2001 ). High accuracy in rapid scene processing (e.g., Evans & Treisman, 2005 ; Fabre-Thorpe et al , 2001 ) may depend on expectation ( McLean et al , 2021 ; Sun et al , 2017 ). In our paradigm participants could not expect the images, yet they still reported impressive details of the briefly presented images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjective nature of the perceived diagnosticity of objects is further demonstrated by higher predictive power (in most experiments) of the specificity measure based on only the 16 categories we used in the experiment compared to the full ADE20K database, which implies that our participants did not necessarily consider the occurrence of objects in other, task-irrelevant categories. When we enter someone’s private apartment and look into a room with a set table and chairs, we are probably sure that this must be the dining room and do not consider that these objects could occur in a restaurant scene as well 61 , 62 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%