2020
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsaa145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expecting social punishment facilitates control over a decision under uncertainty by recruiting medial prefrontal cortex

Abstract: In many decision-making situations, suboptimal choices are increased by uncertainty. However, when wrong choices could lead to social punishment, such as blame, people might try to improve their performance by minimizing suboptimal choices which could be achieved by increasing the subjective cost of errors, thereby globally reducing decision noise or reducing an uncertainty-induced component of decision noise. In this functional MRI study, 46 participants performed a choice task in which the probability of a c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inferred controllability information was leveraged to increase motivated behavior in the vmPFC (Kim et al, 2021). Expecting social punishment such as swear words facilitates control over a decision under uncertainty by recruiting medial prefrontal cortex (Kim and Jeong, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inferred controllability information was leveraged to increase motivated behavior in the vmPFC (Kim et al, 2021). Expecting social punishment such as swear words facilitates control over a decision under uncertainty by recruiting medial prefrontal cortex (Kim and Jeong, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inferred controllability informa-tion was leveraged to increase motivated behavior in the vmPFC [ 43 ]. Expecting social punishment such as swear words facilitates control over a decision under uncertainty by recruiting medial prefrontal cortex [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%