1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0344-0338(89)80013-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental acute pancreatitis — a quantification of dynamics at enzymic and histomorphologic levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
7

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Fixed tissues were sectioned and then stained with H&E (performed by HistoTec Laboratory). Pancreatitis severity was scored in a blinded fashion as described previously (48).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixed tissues were sectioned and then stained with H&E (performed by HistoTec Laboratory). Pancreatitis severity was scored in a blinded fashion as described previously (48).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological investigation of the pancreas is a standard procedure in a b c A -control B -caerulein supramaximal C -taurocholate 3.5% experimental acute pancreatitis and gives relevant information about the severity of pancreatic injury [24,33,34]. We adapted the Spormann score for quantification of experimental pancreatic alterations [35] to our model and evaluated pancreatic oedema and necrosis. Supramaximal caerulein caused histological alterations in pancreatic tissue which are mainly characterised by oedema and marginal necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the first report of acute pancreatitis associated with a complex I deficiency related to a T3231 mutation. In mitochondrial diseases the reduced ATP production in the acinar cells could cause them to be more susceptible to autodigestion and inflammation, as seen after anoxia or ischemia [4]. On the other hand, acute pancreatitis has been recognised as a possible complication of GH therapy with increased enzyme production as a possible mechanism [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%