Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy 2019
DOI: 10.1115/omae2019-96500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Performance of Oscillating Water Column Wave Energy Converter Applicable to Breakwaters

Abstract: In the present study, the primary energy conversion performance of an oscillating water column (OWC) was evaluated through experimental tests and numerical simulations. The experimental tests were performed at an ocean basin located in Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO), Korea. A 1/4 scaled OWC chamber model with an orifice to account for the turbine effect was set up at the 3-dimensional basin, and regular wave tests were performed at various incident wave periods. The water surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The device was tested at a scale of 1:4 relative to a proposed full-scale deployment as part of a breakwater in a water depth of 12.8 m. The experimental measurements were carried out at the Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO) ocean basin in 2019. Preliminary results along with a comparison to CFD calculations were presented in Reference [17]. The geometry and dimensions of the basin are shown in Figure 1, and the wave probe locations are indicated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Experimental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The device was tested at a scale of 1:4 relative to a proposed full-scale deployment as part of a breakwater in a water depth of 12.8 m. The experimental measurements were carried out at the Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering (KRISO) ocean basin in 2019. Preliminary results along with a comparison to CFD calculations were presented in Reference [17]. The geometry and dimensions of the basin are shown in Figure 1, and the wave probe locations are indicated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Experimental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-DOF state-space model: Following a similar procedure as for the 1-DOF models, two 2-DOF models were produced. The first 2-DOF model assumes the air flow across the orifice to be incompressible and uses Equation (17) to model the mass flow rate of air between the OWC chamber and atmosphere, while the second model assumes the air flow across the orifice to be compressible, but uses Equation (18) in place of Equation (17). Both 2-DOF models represent the motion of the water column in the KRISO using a modified version of Equation ( 11) for both mode 7 and mode 8, Equation ( 16) to model the pressure variation within the chamber, and either Equation (17) or Equation (18) to model the mass flow rate through the orifice, as appropriate.…”
Section: The National Renewable Energy Laboratory Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to their separate findings, results from their practical evaluation affirms an improved economic viability of the OWC wave energy converter. This has enhanced an improvement in the applicability of the sloppy breakwater section thus reducing cost in construction of chamber structure [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sloped OWC has an energy extraction performance similar to that of the vertical OWC device, and its installation on the slope of the bottom-mounted breakwater, the existing onshore structure, is advantageous. As a recent study on the sloped OWC chamber, Park, et al (2018b) measured the relative wave elevation inside the chamber, according to the change in skirt and width of a sloped OWC chamber, via a 2D wave tank experiment. In addition, by performing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis, the wave elevation was calculated in two OWC chamber conditions: one with the chamber open, where the chamber pneumatic pressure is equal to the atmospheric pressure, and the other where the duct is installed above the chamber, such that chamber pneumatic pressure exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%