2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:mocm.0000039744.98869.0d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and Numerical Study of the Open-Hole Tensile Strength of Carbon/Epoxy Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
19
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant difference is observed from using the different meshes, indicating the implemented mesh independence strategy is working well. In contrast, one of our previous models of this specimen in [46], which did not implement a mesh independence strategy, demonstrated highly mesh dependent results. According to the studies in [30,31], the implementation of Eq.…”
Section: Mesh Sensitivitycontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…No significant difference is observed from using the different meshes, indicating the implemented mesh independence strategy is working well. In contrast, one of our previous models of this specimen in [46], which did not implement a mesh independence strategy, demonstrated highly mesh dependent results. According to the studies in [30,31], the implementation of Eq.…”
Section: Mesh Sensitivitycontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Generally, carbon fibre-reinforced plastics (CFRP) have been the composite material of choice for use in primary structures due to their high specific strength and modulus. As such, a considerable literature exists on the damage characteristics of notched CFRP laminates [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group of criteria were taken from McCarthy et al [18] and O'Higgins et al [38], see Table 2. The percentage property reduction was set to 90% as proposed by McCarthy et al [18], which was said by O'Higgins et al, in their work [38], to be based on physical observation. (Table 3) 1 (Table 3) 2, 3 (…”
Section: Group Amentioning
confidence: 99%