2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2020.131719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental and theoretical study of the O3/O4 regioselectivity of glycosylation reactions of glucopyranosyl acceptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…44 Nevertheless, acceptors 1 and 2 were more reactive at axial OH-3 with respect to equatorial OH-4 (Table 1 and Scheme 4). In line with our previous results, 15,16 lower regioselectivities were obtained when using the more reactive furanosic donor 5 (entries 3 and 4 vs. 2 and 3). When comparing the behavior of the acceptors with donor 5 , an increase in the relative reactivity of OH-4 was observed when passing from the benzylated to benzoylated acceptor (entries 3 and 4), thus diminishing the regioselectivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…44 Nevertheless, acceptors 1 and 2 were more reactive at axial OH-3 with respect to equatorial OH-4 (Table 1 and Scheme 4). In line with our previous results, 15,16 lower regioselectivities were obtained when using the more reactive furanosic donor 5 (entries 3 and 4 vs. 2 and 3). When comparing the behavior of the acceptors with donor 5 , an increase in the relative reactivity of OH-4 was observed when passing from the benzylated to benzoylated acceptor (entries 3 and 4), thus diminishing the regioselectivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our laboratory we have investigated the relative reactivity of OH-3 and OH-4 of 2,6-di- O -protected galacto- and glucopyranosyl derivatives in glycosidation reactions with different galactosyl donors. 15,16 In the case of d -Gal p acceptors, the formation of 1 → 3 disaccharides was favored, as expected, given the equatorial orientation of the OH-3 group vs. the axial one of the OH-4 group. However, the regioselectivities observed were different depending on the 2,6-substituents, the anomeric configuration of the acceptors, and the reactivities of the donors.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations