1995
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(94)00698-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental characteristics of spatial subharmonics in BSO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent threshold of the subharmonic generation (related to the optical oscillation) is sensitive indeed to the sign of W ja 1 j 2 2 ja 2 j 2 . This feature explains the corresponding experimentally detected difference [19]. We expect that, by distinguishing between the apparent and genuine thresholds of the subharmonic generation, one can explain other still unclear features of this phenomenon [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The apparent threshold of the subharmonic generation (related to the optical oscillation) is sensitive indeed to the sign of W ja 1 j 2 2 ja 2 j 2 . This feature explains the corresponding experimentally detected difference [19]. We expect that, by distinguishing between the apparent and genuine thresholds of the subharmonic generation, one can explain other still unclear features of this phenomenon [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Our guess can only be that optical beam coupling has some influence in the dc case, too, as has been suggested already in the literature. 14,15 What is worth noting is that little emphasis has been made in investigating whether the subharmonic diffraction patterns were due to distinct gratings or narrow packages of gratings. In many cases 1,10,13,[16][17][18][19] a lens has been used to focus the diffracted beams, thus making it impossible to judge their structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%