2018
DOI: 10.1111/bph.14153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers

Abstract: This article updates the guidance published in 2015 for authors submitting papers to British Journal of Pharmacology (Curtis et al., 2015) and is intended to provide the rubric for peer review. Thus, it is directed towards authors, reviewers and editors. Explanations for many of the requirements were outlined previously and are not restated here. The new guidelines are intended to replace those published previously. The guidelines have been simplified for ease of understanding by authors, to make it more strai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
1,233
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,253 publications
(1,269 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
10
1,233
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Probability values of <0.05 were considered significant. The data and statistical analysis comply with the recommendations on experimental design and analysis in pharmacology (Curtis et al ., 2018). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probability values of <0.05 were considered significant. The data and statistical analysis comply with the recommendations on experimental design and analysis in pharmacology (Curtis et al ., 2018). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 3 | RESULTS For in vitro experiments, no statistical method was used to predetermine the sample size.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data and statistical analysis comply with the recommendations on experimental design and analysis in pharmacology (Curtis et al, 2018). Operators for animal experiments and data analysts were not blinded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%