2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental design for functional MRI of scene memory encoding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The present block design to manipulate novelty was chosen because it represents one of the most robust means to elicit reliable MTL responses with fMRI in individual participants (Narayan et al, 2005;Westmacott et al, 2008). This approach allowed us to reveal direct signs of functional integrity in NB's spared left hippocampus and to specify viable neuroanatomical mechanisms that could support hippocampal functioning in the presence of partial de-afferentiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present block design to manipulate novelty was chosen because it represents one of the most robust means to elicit reliable MTL responses with fMRI in individual participants (Narayan et al, 2005;Westmacott et al, 2008). This approach allowed us to reveal direct signs of functional integrity in NB's spared left hippocampus and to specify viable neuroanatomical mechanisms that could support hippocampal functioning in the presence of partial de-afferentiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a novelty paradigm in combination with a block design, because this approach represents one of the most robust means to elicit reliable hippocampal responses with fMRI in individual participants (Narayan et al, 2005;Westmacott et al, 2008). Moreover, novelty signals in the hippocampus have specifically been linked to processing of the types of relationships between stimuli and their context that are critical for episodic recollection, i.e., the process that operates normally in NB (Ranganath and Rainer, 2003;Nyberg, 2005;Kumaran and Maguire, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity and specificity of language activation maps depend largely on how well the activation and control tasks are designed. In addition, sensitivity may vary when event-related designs are compared to traditional block designs, with block designs yielding greater sensitivity (Narayan et al 2005) Event-related single trial designs provide a means for segregating activation trials based on response accuracy or later recall of the stimulus. This has particular relevance in identifying the integrity of functional circuits, e.g., memory encoding circuits.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous fMRI studies have mainly reported results at a group level (Powell et al 2005;Narayan et al 2005). Group results may be satisfactory for neuroscientific questions, but in a clinical setting individual data is crucial (Jansen et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%