2012
DOI: 10.5355/jast.2012.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evaluation of the variation of gamma-ray self-attenuation correction factor with gamma energy and geometry of analytical sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[34] The results were in agreement to those reported in the literature where linear-attenuation coefficients decrease with increasing c-ray energy for a given density and geometry. [35,36] CONCLUSIONS Self-attenuation correction factors and linear-attenuation coefficients were determined for scale waste samples that were produced from the maintenance of NORM contaminated equipment. This was performed by the transmission method using 152 Eu point source.…”
Section: Linear-attenuation Coefficients Of Scale Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34] The results were in agreement to those reported in the literature where linear-attenuation coefficients decrease with increasing c-ray energy for a given density and geometry. [35,36] CONCLUSIONS Self-attenuation correction factors and linear-attenuation coefficients were determined for scale waste samples that were produced from the maintenance of NORM contaminated equipment. This was performed by the transmission method using 152 Eu point source.…”
Section: Linear-attenuation Coefficients Of Scale Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Ghana Research Reactor-1 operates at a half-power of 15 kW with 5.0 ×10 11 cm 2 .s as a corresponding thermal neutron flux [2]. The technique relies on high thermal neutrons flux and large cross-sections for (n,γ) reactions to provide good analytical sensitivity [1,5]. Over the few decades, numerous laboratories worldwide have applied the k0standardization method of INAA (k0-INAA) to suit the comparative procedures for quantifying analytes, which is considered the conventional quantitation method for INAA [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%