2015
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1060504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental evidence of the relative effectiveness of problem-based learning for knowledge acquisition and retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar studies were also conducted at various levels of education [37]- [39]. Besides critical thinking, PBL has also been proven able to increase students' knowledge acquisition [17], [40], [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar studies were also conducted at various levels of education [37]- [39]. Besides critical thinking, PBL has also been proven able to increase students' knowledge acquisition [17], [40], [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Knowledge acquisition is usually expressed in score achievement [15]. Knowledge acquisition is not just memorizing information but understanding meaning [16] so that it is flexible and not determined by certain types of problems [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sonuç olarak, probleme dayalı öğrenme, öğrencilerin kendi öğrenme süreçlerinde aktif bir rol üstlenmeleri için öğrenci merkezli bir öğretim yöntemidir. Öğretmenin rehberliğinde öğrencilerin gerçekçi problemlerde birlikte çalıştıkları grup toplantıları probleme dayalı öğrenmede önemli bir unsur oluşturmaktadır (Wijnen, Loyens ve Schaap, 2015). Probleme dayalı öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenciler, karşılaştıkları sorunu çözmek ve gerekli bilgi ve becerileri geliştirmek için gruplar halinde işbirliği içinde çalışmakta ve kendi öğrenmelerini yönlendirmektedirler (Bergstorm, Pugh, Phillips ve Machlev, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Although studies regarding the effects of PBL have been inconclusive in some regards, they have shown that PBL is not more effective than LBL in terms of knowledge acquisition (Pourshanazari, Roohbakhsh, Khazaei, & Tajadini, ; Wijnen, Loyens, & Schaap, ), while also showing that PBL is more effective than LBL in terms of knowledge retention (Pourshanazari et al, ; Yew & Goh, ). For example, studies have measured the knowledge acquisition of students immediately after or one week after LBL or PBL (Akhu‐Zaheya, Gharaibeh, & Alostaz, ; Wijnen et al, ). Knowledge retention, meanwhile, has usually been measured from at least one week (Wijnen et al, ) to three months (Bowers et al, ; Tran, ) after LBL or PBL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies have measured the knowledge acquisition of students immediately after or one week after LBL or PBL (Akhu‐Zaheya, Gharaibeh, & Alostaz, ; Wijnen et al, ). Knowledge retention, meanwhile, has usually been measured from at least one week (Wijnen et al, ) to three months (Bowers et al, ; Tran, ) after LBL or PBL. The types of tests used to take these measurements have included multiple‐choice tests (Akhu‐Zaheya et al, ) and tests with open‐ended questions (Kasai, Sugimoto, & Uchiyama, ), while some studies have used both multiple‐choice tests and tests with open‐ended questions (Ramsburg & Youmans, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%