2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijmr.2016.079460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental investigations and multi-response optimisation of wire electric discharge machining of hypereutectic Al-Si alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From normalised values, GRC and GRG is calculated. Maximum GRG from all GRG values represents the desired value of the multi-response (Dieguez et al, 2007;Mohapatra et al, 2017;Babu et al, 2016). The procedures for solving GRA are as follows.…”
Section: Methodology Of Gramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From normalised values, GRC and GRG is calculated. Maximum GRG from all GRG values represents the desired value of the multi-response (Dieguez et al, 2007;Mohapatra et al, 2017;Babu et al, 2016). The procedures for solving GRA are as follows.…”
Section: Methodology Of Gramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GRC is the ratio of referral and comparable sequence for each effort. The GRC is calculated by equation (4) and given in table 5. ζ=distinguishing coefficient, and taken as 0.50 in many metal cutting problems [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Grey Relational Analyses (Gra) Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajyalakshmi and Venkata Ramaiah (2015) presented an application of Taguchi and GRA methods for optimization of WEDM process parameters (pulse-on time, pulse-off time, corner servo voltage, flushing pressure, wire feed, wire tension, servo feed and spark gap voltage). Babu et al (2016) applied two multi-objective optimization methodologies, i.e. GRA and PCA for determining the optimal settings of pulse-on time, pulse-off time, wire FR and variation of percentage of silicon in a WEDM process; and concluded that PCA would be a better optimization tool than GRA.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%