1986 Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium 1986
DOI: 10.1109/aps.1986.1149789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental results illustrating performance limitations and design tradeoffs in probe-fed microstrip-patch element phased arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soon, an avalanche of papers and books followed on microstrip antennas, which by the 1980s was reaching maturity and has been continually developed in the antenna field for over half a century. Compared with the many papers on singleended microstrip antennas, there were few papers on differential microstrip antennas in the 1980s [58] - [62], despite the latter having clearly shown advantage in suppressing higher-order modes, reducing cross-polarized radiation, removing pattern distortion, and producing an improved axial ratio for circular polarization.…”
Section: Microstrip Antennasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soon, an avalanche of papers and books followed on microstrip antennas, which by the 1980s was reaching maturity and has been continually developed in the antenna field for over half a century. Compared with the many papers on singleended microstrip antennas, there were few papers on differential microstrip antennas in the 1980s [58] - [62], despite the latter having clearly shown advantage in suppressing higher-order modes, reducing cross-polarized radiation, removing pattern distortion, and producing an improved axial ratio for circular polarization.…”
Section: Microstrip Antennasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Square patch antennas also excite higher-order modes, which contaminate the cross-polarization when values are less than −30 dB. To improve cross-polarization isolation, a microstrip patch antenna was fed with a balanced network [15], [16]. A power divider that provides the same magnitude for each excited feed position with a 180 • phase shift improves the crosspolarization levels to less than −30 dB.…”
Section: Antenna Design Trade-offsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the beam scans, resonance anomalies appear if the feeding structure is not well isolated. In [15], scanning was improved by implementing a Wilkinson power divider for the differential feeding. Scanning performances shown in the probe-fed antennas in [26] have a range of ±35 • .…”
Section: Antenna Array Designmentioning
confidence: 99%