2021
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2021.27160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental studies on the removal of heavy metal ion concentration using sugarcane bagasse in batch adsorption process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the ion concentration in the solution increased gradually, the metal ion uptake was slowly Because of the of at low metal ion concentrations, the adsorption process was quick. Metal ions absorbed by the adsorbent become saturated in the mesopores (Yogeshwaran et al, 2021). In this batch study, 25 mg L -1 concentrated metal ion solution provides high adsorption efficiency using groundnut shell charcoal powder.…”
Section: Figure 9 Influence Of Metal Ion Concentration In Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When the ion concentration in the solution increased gradually, the metal ion uptake was slowly Because of the of at low metal ion concentrations, the adsorption process was quick. Metal ions absorbed by the adsorbent become saturated in the mesopores (Yogeshwaran et al, 2021). In this batch study, 25 mg L -1 concentrated metal ion solution provides high adsorption efficiency using groundnut shell charcoal powder.…”
Section: Figure 9 Influence Of Metal Ion Concentration In Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The plots of D-R isotherm (ln qe vs € 2 ) for chromium, lead and zinc metal ions are shown in Figure 13, and the constants are presented in Table 5. By fixing a constant temperature of 30°C, the regression coefficient (R 2 ) values were calculated and the values were observed to be in agreement (R 2 > 0.95) with the adsorption process (Yogeshwaran et al, 2021). Then, the R 2 values calculated by Temkin and D -R isotherm plots were compared to each other to find out the best fit of isotherm study.…”
Section: D-r Adsorption Isothermmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14, and the constants are presented in Table 4. By xing a constant temperature of 30°C, the regression coe cient (R 2 ) values were calculated, and the values were observed to agree (R 2 > 0.95) with the adsorption process (Yogeshwaran et al, 2021). Then, the R 2 values calculated by Temkin, D -R and Sips isotherm plots were compared to each other to nd the best t for the isotherm study.…”
Section: Ftir -Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%