2020
DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2020.1849795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of the impact of passenger behavior on the aircraft cabin environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang (2014) believed that a weighted acceleration range between 0.315 and 0.8 is comfortable and meets the comfort requirements of passengers traveling on high-speed trains. In his evaluation of a type of passenger seat, Zhang et al (2019) considered that a total weighted acceleration greater than 0.315 was in the uncomfortable range. Ciloglu et al (2015) used BS 6841-1987 (Guide to measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock) and ISO 2631-1997 (Mechanical vibration and shock -Evaluation of human exposure to wholebody vibration -Part 1: General requirements) to assess the vibration comfort of aircraft during the full operational phase and concluded that the aircraft was least comfortable during the landing phase.…”
Section: Vibration Comfort Rating For Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang (2014) believed that a weighted acceleration range between 0.315 and 0.8 is comfortable and meets the comfort requirements of passengers traveling on high-speed trains. In his evaluation of a type of passenger seat, Zhang et al (2019) considered that a total weighted acceleration greater than 0.315 was in the uncomfortable range. Ciloglu et al (2015) used BS 6841-1987 (Guide to measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock) and ISO 2631-1997 (Mechanical vibration and shock -Evaluation of human exposure to wholebody vibration -Part 1: General requirements) to assess the vibration comfort of aircraft during the full operational phase and concluded that the aircraft was least comfortable during the landing phase.…”
Section: Vibration Comfort Rating For Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other interventions in response to COVID-19 include intermittent occupancy (intentional breaks between occupants entering and leaving the space, studied in classroom settings) [366] and the use of ceiling fans (to promote air mixing) [367]. Reviews and studies assessing infection risks in specific spaces encompass classrooms [183,368], aircraft [369][370][371][372][373], passenger cars [374], buses [375], enclosed or confined spaces [10,376], gyms [377], concert halls [378], and washrooms [379].…”
Section: Dissemination In the Same Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passenger activities have a significant impact on resuspension and deposition on the surface of passengers [194,195]. The occupants' adjustments of the seatback angle increase the risk of longitudinal transmission of contaminants [196,197]. A passenger cough affects more passengers in an aircraft cabin during the ascent [198].…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%