2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the seismic behavior of high-performance cold-formed steel plate shear walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Available investigations on self-centering frame [5,7,[18][19][20][21] show that the prestressed design provides recentering ability, and the pure self-centering frame exhibit trilinear hysteretic relationship. Studies on the infill-thin web plates [22][23][24][25] also find that due to the buckling and plastic deformation, the shear plate shows pinching effect in hysteretic curves. Since the coupling effect between thin web plates and self-centering frame are negligible, the hysteretic behaviour of SC-SPSW is assumed by a trilinear relationship superposed by a pinching relationship.…”
Section: Hysteretic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Available investigations on self-centering frame [5,7,[18][19][20][21] show that the prestressed design provides recentering ability, and the pure self-centering frame exhibit trilinear hysteretic relationship. Studies on the infill-thin web plates [22][23][24][25] also find that due to the buckling and plastic deformation, the shear plate shows pinching effect in hysteretic curves. Since the coupling effect between thin web plates and self-centering frame are negligible, the hysteretic behaviour of SC-SPSW is assumed by a trilinear relationship superposed by a pinching relationship.…”
Section: Hysteretic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Researchers around the world have performed systematic investigations on the factors influencing CFS wall seismic performance, such as type of wall sheathing (Ayatollahi et al, 2020; Buonopane et al, 2015; Gao and Xiao, 2017; Lin et al, 2014; Xu et al, 2021; Yu, 2010; Ye et al, 2015; Zhou et al, 2012; Zeynalian and Ronagh, 2015; Zhang et al, 2021), section and distance of wall stud (Shi et al, 2021, 2022), brace type (Moghimi and Ronagh, 2009; Xu et al, 2021; Zeynalian and Ronagh, 2015), arrangement of self–tapping screw (Ayatollahi et al, 2020; Yu, 2010), wall height–width ratio (Buonopane et al, 2015; Yu, 2010; Zeynalian and Ronagh, 2015), etc. Based on the above research works, two CFS wall failure modes were drawn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above research works have revealed that the application of filling materials effectively improved the seismic performance and shear capacity of CFS walls. Also, some measures have been proposed to improve the buckling behaviors of wall studs, such as the application of double C–section studs in back–to–back (Lin et al, 2014; Nithyadharan and Kalyanaraman, 2012; Shi et al, 2021) and face–to–face (Shi et al, 2022; Wu et al, 2018; Xu et al, 2018b) arrangements. Research has revealed that the buckling responses of square–section wall studs were better than those of studs with other sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the connection between the sheathing and the steel keel was a critical factor in determining the failure mode of the CFS shear wall. Shi et al (2022) conducted experimental studies on high-performance cold-formed steel plate shear walls. They found that the shear capacity of composite walls could be significantly enhanced through the use of vertical stiffeners or hat-section end studs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%