Experimental technology for harvesting the cotton yield

Gorlova, Irina; Khalmuradov, T

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202125804039

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When conducting the test, the level of each parameter of the two types of plucking mechanisms was adjusted, ensuring the consistency of each parameter of the two types of plucking mechanisms and keeping the implements advancing at a uniform speed during the process of pulling culms. After adjusting the parameters, every 20 m of the machine moving forward was a group of tests, before and after 5 m as a transition section [19]. Before operation, the number of cotton stalks in the rows of the two pulling structures in the middle 10 m of the 20 m length to be operated was recorded as W 1 for the belt-clamping side and W 2 for the chain-clamping side.…”

Section: Field Trial Validation Indicators and Methods Of Testingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison and Experimental Study of Cotton Stalk Extraction via Nip Roller Based on Nip Motion Trajectory Equation

Wang,

Zhang,

Huo

et al. 2024

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the field of straw recycling, a cotton straw-harvesting mechanism is an important piece of agricultural equipment. The mechanistic analysis method of the harvesting mechanism is a major focus of research and development in this field. Currently, in the mechanistic analysis of the cotton straw recycling mechanism, the kinematic and mechanical analysis of the recycling mechanism is generally the main focus. There is not a lot of research based on the quantitative analysis between different recycling mechanisms. In this study, a clamped cotton straw pulling mechanism is optimized and designed, and two different pulling structures are designed. In addition, a two-dimensional modeling and analysis method is used to establish the two-dimensional equations of motion of the two pulling mechanisms, analyze the leakage and breakage rates of the two clamping structures, predict the final pulling effect, and verify the results of the field tests. According to the analysis, the belt-clamping side has more uniform clamping stress and a larger clamping contact area than the chain-clamping side, and the tangential stress on cotton straw is smaller. Based on the field-test verification, the band-clamping side had a higher pulling net rate by an average of 19.32% and a lower missed pulling rate by an average of 6.01% than the chain-clamping side. Therefore, it was determined that the main reason for the lower pulling net rate of the chain-gripped side than that of the belt-gripped side was the higher pulling breakage rate, and the secondary reason was the high leakage pulling rate. Thus, the feasibility and accuracy of the analytical method of this study are verified.

show abstract

Section: Field Trial Validation Indicators and Methods Of Testingmentioning

confidence: 99%